I really don't take any joy in making an ever growing list of AskTRP rules but it's becoming increasingly clear how little repeat offenders seriously just are not doing any real work on learning anything outside of milking (abusing) AskTRP for mental masturbation.

I've noticed one pattern in particular:

Guys abuse AskTRP, asking far too many mental masturbation questions, absolutely plead and insist that they've read the sidebar, they get a ban warning unless they write FRs, and then their FRs are full of not understanding anything in game or women.

Looks dudes, it's extremely clear why your "newbie Q's" are permanently so newbie, as well as why the field reports are off. You CLEARLY ARE NOT DOING ANY RESEARCH ON YOUR OWN

Look, you guys are going to be held accountable for what you look up (or lack thereof). Instituting this rule for 4 reasons:

1. To show you are even looking up any game instructions AT ALL
2. To let commenters see if you ignored their game recommendations or not
3. To pinpoint terrible game resources you are watching.
4. So that you actually have to give a shit and do your own research, we can't sit here and coach you for life.

Going forward, if you game is bad or you are clearly confused about game in a FR, you are going to be required to state where you are learning game. If you're not doing any actual work learning game, you will be banned from AskTRP.

1) clubs are terrible. You're getting ripped off (exorbitant cover charges + expensive-ass drinks), the music is always too loud to converse, and all the women have their bitch shields set to maximum.

2)

as I started the approach, the prettier one said: "No, just no". She didn't even give me a chance to talk at all, while the other chick didn't even look at me, not even once.

I trust that you stopped trying right then and went on to do anything else in the world, right?

Or did you try to salvage what was doomed from the start? At the expense of your pride and your time?

3)

The opener was cheesy: Hey "random female name" I know you. Basically I pick a name then I talk to her like I know her, "are you her", "wdyd here".

I thought it would be a good test, a chick which really liked me would just smile and answer "yes that's me".

Did you really think this through?

You're actively filtering in favor of chicks who will lie to you about who they are, and filtering out all the ones who will give an honest "no, that's not me".

Is that really what you want?

But, as I said, I don't think the opener matters that much, all that matters if the chick likes me right away

It does, but not as much as whether she is already attracted. It can tip the scales if she's undecided, or completely ruin your chances of it's something retarded like "hey [insert random woman's name], I know you. What are you doing here?" Fuck, asking a chick "what are you doing here?' is just asking for the most sarcastic, bitchy response possible.

I recommend that if you're anywhere, such as a grocery store, and an attractive woman makes eye contact with you and smiles at you, you immediately open with "hi, I'm [whatever your RL name is]. That's a nice shirt/ jacket/ hat". It's straightforward, and instead of complimenting something she can't control like her eyes, you're complimenting her taste.