Welcome to The Hub. This is our welcoming tribe dedicated to introducing yourself, meeting new people, and learning about new tribes.
@Typo-MAGAshiv I stand corrected on those points.
She was a domestic terrorist who attempted to murder a federal agent who was carrying out his lawful duties.
I find that a bit too loaded to go as far as that with you. Those nouns and verbs have pretty high bars to clear… but I guess we won’t know cause she was retarded and died. Lol.
@Typo-MAGAshiv It’s disingenuous to the extreme to
-
Claim she didn’t hit him
- Ignore that she was fleeing from an order
I get not liking authority, I get wanting to protest against your political opponents and their motives, I get that she probably shouldn’t even be dead.
However, in order to even begin mitigating the gap between world views, @mentorpheus needs to at least observe the objective facts.
-
American police are armed
-
Vehicles are considered dangerous weapons
-
She hit him
-
She defied a stop order
- She was fleeing
Given all of these things are true there is a much greater than zero chance she winds up dead. She was too stupid to fathom the sandbox she decided to play in and she got the worst outcome for her actions. She had plenty of steps between life and death and she rejected them all.
Moralising it, virtue signalling it, turning it to a progressive/punk/resistance narrative is retarded - like her.
His reluctance to even bother grappling with these objective facts tells me all I need to know, and the discussion shouldn’t be coerced into being anything other than a stupid woman dying in a monumentally stupid way.
Read More
1
2
@MentORPHEUS you never watched the footage, obviously.
He was in front. She actually hit him, but couldn't get up to speed to cause real damage thanks to his quick reactions. He was treated for internal bleeding for his injuries.
2
2
She was fleeing
That part is incorrect. She was trying to get in the way, obstruct, and disrupt as much as possible.
She defied a stop order
She also defied multiple other commands, including to leave the area (which would have avoided the attempted detention and her death had she followed it) and to get out of the car (which would have avoided her death had she followed it)
She was a domestic terrorist who attempted to murder a federal agent who was carrying out his lawful duties.
1
1
real damage
To clarify: his injuries were real, but not life-threatening. Had he not shot her, he'd have been the one to die instead.
Story got sat on for years
By whom?
[crap about Israel]
I barely give 2 flying fucks whether they even exist. Irrelevant.
Take any book's advice with a grain of salt. Books are written by people, and people are flawed.
1) "48 Laws of Power" by Robert Greene. Don't skip the intro. This book is mainly to prevent such shit from happening to you.
2) "How To Win Friends And Influence People" by Dale Carnegie. Some of it hasn't aged well (it's like 100 years old at this point), and some of the advice has been poorly implemented through overuse by sleazy salespeople ("pepper the conversation with the other person's name!" - I've talked to sales weasels who used my name so much, it was distracting! if I did a shot every time they said it, I'd be in the hospital!), but it's still useful. Just don't overdo it like too many do.
3) "No More Mr. NiceGuy" by Dr. Robert Glover. Managing your expectations and being assertive.
4) "When I Say No I Feel Guilty" by Dr. Manuel Smith. Assertiveness.
That's all that comes to mind at the moment. Good luck.
Read More@MentORPHEUS your whole status is full of lies
1) Calling a psychotic, fat dike what she is was isn't dehumanizing; it's accurately describing her. Just like when I call you a liar, it's not dehumanizing you, you liar.
2) she wasn't murdered. She attempted to murder that ICE agent by running him over, and got shot in self-defense. She'd still be alive if she had not tried that stunt.
3) I have a "serious question of core morality and character" for you: why do you keep lying?
1
1
IDK how much you know about Nick Shirley
The most important things to know about him:
1) he did the job the legacy lamestream media has been failing to do over the past couple of decades: investigative journalism on behalf of the people.
2) the legacy lamestream media, instead of trying to dig further into what he exposed, immediately set out to smear and discredit him in any way possible.
his IQ appears to hover around room temperature.
So what?
Elon Musk himself and others, artificially signal boosted the "Somali Fraud" piece,
So what?
And oh, kind of like how Twitter's previous owners artificially suppressed any discussion of Hunter Biden's laptop, covid and the vaccine, the results of the stolen 2020 election, and others?
Yeah, big difference. Boosting a story that is factual and important is fine. Suppressing facts is not.
Face it: your side not only lacks the moral high ground, it lacks a single moral leg to stand on.
Read More
1
1
Are you really accepting of murdering people when they are "just" fat dykes, or other outgroups? This is a serious question of core morality and character.
Does “other out groups” cover “morons” and “cretins”? I’m not sure if it’s fully encompassing of “accepting” as much as “oh yeah, you probably shouldn’t have done that” when you see “morons” and “cretins” wind up dead when they do moronic and cretinous things.
But I can see how it would look accepting from a worldview that’s dialled excruciatingly into the politics of moralising and virtue signalling.
This moron is not the martyr you are looking for.
