RULES
The Hub is moderated for decorum. Please follow these rules while participating in The Hub:
- Be courteous and friendly to new members.
- Do not attempt to scare off new users from using the platform.
- Do advertise your Tribes and invite users to join conversations in them.
- Always Follow Our Content Policy
These rules only apply to The Hub with the exception of the content policy which is site-wide. Please observe individual tribe rules when visiting other tribes.
Sick of Rules? Want to Shit-talk?
Join The Beer Hall
Want a FLAIR next to your name? Send a message to redpillschool. Reasonable requests will be granted.
Have questions? Ask away here!
Join our chatroom for live entertainment.
A "plate" is one of several women in your rotation. If you have one woman you're having sex with, there's nothing wrong with that, but she's not a "plate". Your behaviour towards her, and the overthinking and psychoanalysing underlying your post, reflects the fact that, to you, she's not a plate.
If you're wondering why you're this way, and the other guy is that way, you probably don't have to look much further than that. To him, she's probably one of several women in his rotation - a "plate" in the true meaning of the word. So he's got the abundance and lack of emotional investment to be The Skittles Man (look it up).
Like, can you imagine the other guy writing this long-ass post on the internet about this one particular woman? Of course not. Because she doesn't take up that much space in his mind. And that's the difference.
Basically, it's as simple as AF/BB. That's essentially what this all boils down to.
Read MoreOk. Some of this is going to hurt my man.
I've said the below in the interests of honesty and growth.
But you are half BP and half RP, and you've got some pain coming your way. I'm sorry for that, so maybe don't read all of this in one go.
We need more context.
- How long have you been seeing her?
- How often?
- Is she clear that you are fucking other women?
Apparently, she has been spinning another guy for years
Right. You say "for years", but how many years?
The interesting part is that he apparently gives her almost nothing in return. He doesn’t buy her things. He doesn’t take her out.
Right.
My read is that this guy is basically treating her as a convenient fuck toy while she continues hoping that eventually all the sexual investment she has made will somehow convert into a relationship.
Yes, but you are slightly misreading her side of things.
Although I regarded her as a plate, I actually did quite a lot of the stereotypically “beta” stuff. I bought her gifts, spent money on her, took her out, etc out of good faith.
What does "out of good faith" mean here?
TRP is clear on this stuff: provider behaviour kills sexual desire. It makes the whole thing transactional, and for women that overrides the sexual component. It also triggers "make him wait". It triggers Last Minute Resistance. It also makes her fake sexual interest: keep the stuff incoming in exchange for faux-sexual availability, thus masking her true sexual interest.
So seeing how willingly she has sexually invested herself in another guy who apparently gives her almost nothing in return has made me realise that, in a sense, I was probably paying for something that this other guy was getting for free.
You shouldn't be paying for women. The more you pay, the less you get. Women who want to fuck you will fuck you.
You probably have low self esteem, or are unable to fully sexually initiate, or you don't think you're that attractive. Thus you are compensating with dates, money, gifts, even though you claim to see her as a FWB (I can't use "plate" to describe women, women are not crockery).
Obviously that’s on me. I’m not complaining about having spent the money or gifts — I chose to do it. But psychologically, it has made me question what I was actually doing and what I was getting out of the arrangement.
You frame this transactionally. "I was paying X, I was getting Y". This means you were basically paying for sex.
PAYING FOR SEX DOES NOT WORK.
Paying will, at best, only buy you time with a woman (eg dates), but it doesn't buy you what you want: her sexual interest in you.
Success is attractive. The CAPABILITY of having spare resources that you COULD spend on her is attractive. But any actual provisioning or romance or expensive dates is provider behaviour. You should know this by now.
Better places to spend money: Yourself. Your clothes, your lifestyle. Invest in YOURSELF, not her. She gets to enjoy the ride, but you own the ride. There are ways to spend money to get sex, but none of it is on her.
There is perhaps one exception: a very occasional fun adventure-date.
For now, I’ve basically withdrawn my attention.
This is good. In a world where her sexual interest is waning, you should be downsizing the rest of the relationship to match (ie attention, time together).
Her recent messages are increasingly about her feelings, frustrations with life and how I’m supposedly her only friend, wanting to have dinner, etc. I’m not interested in becoming her emotional support system so I’ve stopped engaging.
Right. Tricky though, because she's done nothing wrong in her head. She has no direct control over her sexual feelings (any more than you do). She will feel and experience this as "entirely natural, and that's what I feel".
The challenge for you is to leverage this desire into hot monkey sex. It can be done, but you've got to do it right. Basically the trick, as far as I can tell, is to package it all up together: arrange a "date night" (or some other phrasing).... and tell her how fun it's going to be.... "Lavish each other with attention, I'll wear that shirt you like, you'll be wearing lingerie".
On the day: listen to her complain, be super understanding, for 15 mins max. After that "Ok, enough about our problems, tell me.... what's your favourite icecream?"..... or whatever. Have some convo ideas lined up in your head, and be relentless about changing the subject after she's unloaded.
What I’m genuinely curious about, though, is the other guy.
He has been doing what you should have been doing.
How does this usually end when a woman has invested this heavily into a guy sexually for years while hoping that the relationship will eventually materialise?
It usually ends with one of them getting bored/annoyed with the other.
At what point does she realise it isn’t happening?
Either she meets someone and goes monogamous, or he fails a shit test, or she starts banging-and-hoping someone else.
Does increasing the amount of sex, nudes, attention and availability actually reinforce the behaviour because she occasionally gets enough attention from him to keep the hope alive?
She hasn't thought it through this much. She's thinking "I want X, therefore send nudes".
Or does there eventually come a point where the accumulated frustration turns into resentment, confrontation, jealousy, or some kind of emotional explosion?
Depending on the woman, often yes. And that's fine, this guy is probably banging others, and knows the score. He'll shrug and walk away.
What puzzles me most is that she doesn’t seem to be walking away despite apparently getting very little from him beyond sexual attention.
But you're missing something here. You see it as "Pay sex, hope to get relationship". That's how women phrase it, but it contains a very serious lie in order to preserve her value.
Here is the reality: "Enjoy the hot sex, hope to get relationship"....... or, in some cases..... "Enjoy the hot sex, pretend to want relationship".
Why would she walk away? She's getting the hot sex she wants.
You need to understand this dynamic. She's not paying sex and hoping to get relationship. She's enjoying hot sex, and wanting to lock that down and convert to a relationship.
I’m also wondering whether I should be careful about anything on my end and how I should respond to her messages from time to time about having dinner etc. Given that I’m now pulling back while she is simultaneously becoming increasingly emotionally frustrated with this other guy,
Is she though? Or is it all upsides with him?
is there any possibility that I could end up becoming the fallback/attention source when things eventually implode with him?
I think you are that already.
And finally, putting the RP terminology aside for a moment, what should I actually learn from this situation?
Be him
I’m beginning to think I may have misunderstood the dynamics of the arrangement myself. I treated her as a plate,
You didn't treat her as a FWB though. You listen to her, give her attention, give her security, You pay for dates, you buy her gifts. You treated her as a girlfriend.
but perhaps I was behaving more like an LTR provider
Yes. Exactly.
while another guy was getting the raw sexual attraction without having to provide any of that.
Yes.... but getting what he has, isn't as easy as just withholding attention.
I don't know what you want, in general.
The "half girlfriend" thing can be done.... the FWB thing. More than sex, less than relationship, multiple at a time. It can be done. But you do need to understand the dynamic of what provisioning (gifts, dinner dates, listening to her, providing security) does to the female brain and how it acts as a turn off for her.
The standard questions: because they matter deeply: how old are you, what's your bodyfat percentage, how muscular are you.
And lastly, sorry for any pain this causes you.
Read MoreThis one is easy. You only have ambitions when there is something worth striving for. Modern western woman is only interested in the top men. So for them its still worth having a wife and a bit on the side, (no problem if she is lower value because she is temporary anyway). For the rest, its like "Fuck it, I am not going to actually get what I want from a woman. Let me see if I can get what I want in other life areas".
Men actually want more than just sex, they want respect, emotional support and nurturing. Modern western woman is all about herself while wanting you to be all about her. Fuck off!
Welp, thanks to domestic and geopolitics, stations in California are posting diesel prices of $9.99 which is the highest number possible without massive upgrades to pump and display systems. I'm old enough to remember when gas topped $1.00 circa 1980. Pumps back then had physical digits in mechanical displays, and many stations modded the internal gearing and added a painted or stickered on 1. next to the mechanical digits, and many stayed that way for years and years.
My first adult job was at one of the last LA area stations that hadn't converted the service bays to a mini mart with 1 cashier and digital remote pumps. I thought I was applying for a mechanic job but that old fart just used me as a pump jockey till a Pep boys hired me.
We'd run payment to the central cash box and run change back out, and process MasterCharge and Bank Americard payments using an old school chunk-chunk quadruplicate form imprinter. After each sale, we'd reset the pump with a special square key and the numbers would noisily reset to zero.
I remember one day, the gas price had fluctuated up like 4c since the week before. This old fart, plausibly a WWI vet, took his anger at this with me, an 18yo with zero control over the fact; shouting, WE SHOULD HAVE JUST TOLD THOSE IRANIANS HOW MUCH WE'D PAY THEM FOR THE GODDAMN OIL!!! The he tried to screech off like a power flex in his 20yo 8MPG lead sled that was obviously misfiring on at least 2 of its 8 cylinders.
Funny afterward, I was working at a tire store 2 years later when the old fart station owner came in to buy 2 tires for a customer's car. He spotted me across the shop and started yelling out, DON'T HIRE THAT GUY, HE'LL QUIT ON YOU!! HE'LL QUIT! HE'LL QUIT ON YOU!! As he kept on, I realized he wasn't joking, he was still seriously bitter over me quitting after ignoring several inquiries about promotion to mechanic work. The other pump jockey I had worked with was 30 years my senior, content to coast in a near minimum wage nowhere job.
Read MoreBelow treat as various possible scenarios to see how could that look rather than sure thing
asked him whether he was married and he never answered the question.
Gaming her, she almoat 100% sure he is not, he knew that, but refuses to answer straight, replying: If I have a wife I will put a dildo on her and make her fuck you. This is non low quality answer like "no""yes"
Got to finish later
In the end market forces always win in a LTR. Plate or not, it ran for a time because you provided enough benefit to her. You aren't providing what she wants so she withdraws (women withdraw anyway with time, being in love is short lived and a woman not in love is far more transactional that she likes to think).
You can't fool her forever. You can make a woman double down on her investment at first by playing her but in the end she is going to get pretty pissed off and resentful and realise you are not what she wants. She will feel stupid and that will make her more bitter and the hamster will turn it against you. You were supposed to be her guy, on her side, her support and you were a fraud. You will eventually just be another crappy ex. Men are such bastards!....
There is no magic moment the realisation comes but -unless there is a monkey branch- the break usually happens when you finally decide to stop putting in the energy to spin her wheels just enough to get her to give you just enough affection to keep you interested. You realise that you put in more than you get out and so you stop the spinning.
As for the other guy in your case, he was just higher value in her mind and he was just chill enough not to care enough to commit, so she kept trying. Another girl who valued you above the other guy would have done it the other way round. If she actually gets into a relationship with him, he will let her down and she will become bitter and walk. At the moment he is probably just high value in her mind, and while she had you she could hope. I expect that had she only had him, they would be done by now. She had a situation where you were the bread and he the butter in her sandwich. Take away the bread and you can't get far with the butter.
Read MoreShe could have done so much more with her one-time profile picture displayed to the world, but has the audacity to complain that the single men who pursue her didn’t do enough with their entire lives.
She has long hair with the grays colored, and she’s satisfied keeping it away in a ponytail. I suspect those earrings are costume too. Proudly wearing costume jewelry at her age would be a total laugh riot given her demand for ambition and success.
I thought feminists hated ambition in men as it reinforces the PATRIARCHY!

