RULES
The Hub is moderated for decorum. Please follow these rules while participating in The Hub:
- Be courteous and friendly to new members.
- Do not attempt to scare off new users from using the platform.
- Do advertise your Tribes and invite users to join conversations in them.
- Always Follow Our Content Policy
These rules only apply to The Hub with the exception of the content policy which is site-wide. Please observe individual tribe rules when visiting other tribes.
Sick of Rules? Want to Shit-talk?
Join The Beer Hall
Want a FLAIR next to your name? Send a message to redpillschool. Reasonable requests will be granted.
Have questions? Ask away here!
Join our chatroom for live entertainment.
One day, she'll have a necklace made of her old engagement rings.
Most women do not understand that the grass is green where they water it
The grass is greenest above the septic tank.
Are you mad? What are people going to think about me?
Well gee lady, they're going to think you are going to remain single so long as you fail to grasp that your marriage value is rock-bottom and your demands sky-high.
From Brave's AI:
No, you cannot send direct messages to someone on Venmo without initiating a transaction.
According to user discussions on Reddit, Venmo does not have a standalone messaging feature for non-transactional communication. To contact someone, you must use one of the following methods:
Send a small payment with a note: You can transfer a minimal amount (e.g., $0.01) and include your message in the transaction note.
Send a payment request: You can send a request for money (even if intended to be ignored or declined) and attach a message, which the recipient can see.
Comment on a past transaction: If you have an existing transaction history with the person, you can comment on that specific completed transaction.
Venmo’s design is strictly financial; any communication is embedded within the context of a payment, request, or transaction comment.
Send a payment request: You can send a request for money (even if intended to be ignored or declined) and attach a message, which the recipient can see.
I'm going to send these dumb twats payment requests, saying something like "you should pay me for inflicting that stupid birthday request upon my eyeballs. That'll be $20".
Read More@First-light in case it wasn't clear, my reply was to him in particular. He's still a free man.
But yeah, this sucks big time for men like you. It's fucked up.
I mean, I knew there were risks when I got married. I didn't realize just what a bad deal for men it really is, but I still freely chose this. You made choices to avoid this, and your government is fixing to assrape you as if you had gotten married all along.
As if your government hasn't assraped the native Brits enough already.
Man, if I'm a 6 foot 4 doctor and this chick arrives at the date dressed like she is, I'm cancelling the date right there on the spot. Plain white t-shirt, nails not done. If that's how she dresses to impresses for a first date, then imagine what she looks like on day where she doesn't care.
You're going by the blue pilled definition of hypergamy, again, which only focuses on the beta bucks aspect.
Hypergamy as defined by RP and evolutionary psychology is a woman wanting a man who is above her in every possible way. This includes alpha fucks and beta bucks. Most blue pilled discussion completely ignores the alpha fucks aspect.
Some other corrections:
women's hypergamy is a philosophy
Its origin is instinct. It's biological. They can't help having it.
However, they can help what they do about it.
but also a strategy that, even when successful, requires a denial of love
Not quite.
When you're a woman's hypergamous best option, she will love you. But beware that women are incapable of loving men the way men love women. As Rollo says so frequently, men love idealistically while women love opportunistically.
It's also why when a woman no longer views her man as her hypergamous best option, the man will experience the light switch effect. It'll be as though she never loved him in the first place.
They operate based on their instincts and their emotions. Facts don't matter.
facts are a tool of the patriarchy!
Anyway, a few illustrative examples of women still practicing hypergamy while marrying a man who makes less than they do:
1) I was junior enlisted when I met my wife. She brought in more money than me. I left her in the dust when I became an officer, then fell behind for a few years after getting out of the Army. I have since left her in the dust in my trade.
2) one of my mentors in this trade is married to a stockbroker. He makes bank, but her income blows his out of the water
3) one of my colleagues in this trade is married to a PhD research scientist. He makes bank, but she makes significantly more.
What do all 3 of us have in common that these women were willing to marry men who made less?
1) I'm the shortest at 5' 11". Both of these other dudes are well over 6'.
2) all 3 of is are charming as hell. The mentor dude is likely the least charming of the 3 of us, but still above average in charm.
3) all 3 of us exude ZFG energy.
Hypergamy can be satisfied without the man earning more. Hell, sometimes the man can even be a bum. Oprah has had Steadman living at her expense for decades now.
Oh, and the entitled physician inspin who inspired your post? She still seeks above her level in the alpha fucks category as well. Hell, I don't even meet her demands as a 5' 11" midget, but I'm still above her.
Read More