RULES
The Hub is moderated for decorum. Please follow these rules while participating in The Hub:
- Be courteous and friendly to new members.
- Do not attempt to scare off new users from using the platform.
- Do advertise your Tribes and invite users to join conversations in them.
- Always Follow Our Content Policy
These rules only apply to The Hub with the exception of the content policy which is site-wide. Please observe individual tribe rules when visiting other tribes.
Sick of Rules? Want to Shit-talk?
Join The Beer Hall
Want a FLAIR next to your name? Send a message to redpillschool. Reasonable requests will be granted.
Have questions? Ask away here!
Join our chatroom for live entertainment.
You and adam helped me realize some flaws in that. I will just make the post about current events instead and regretting having Billy's kid
I think I could honestly leave out any mention of Briffaults law and keep it to regret about fucking betas
My core idea was that they abort billys kid and lament having him and can't pursue their hypergamous sexual strategy amongst other things
I know women use their kids for shallow gain, I was referring to actually caring deeply about those kids but I suppose what I was trying to say is still defeated by the point that they use their kids regardless
I'll just take that out and make the post more related to current events instead, I don't know what I was thinking
@adam-l @Typo-MAGAshiv i unplublsshed the article and delteted the post i made
i don't normally crank out articles, im not happy with the wording. Ill talk about it on this site first and see if it's relevant or if i should just cut that out and keep my core ideas without briffaults law in the article
I edited that post after the fact
I changed it to doubts a benefit of association
Perhaps I should have formulated more. I might just leave it on X where most of that discussion is happening.
I explained it in the article as more of an abortion conversation but also how moms end up not liking the kids as they prevent her from finding better hypergamous matches later. Gave the Lindsay Clancy example, SIDS, abortion, transgendering dad's son when they don't like him
Contrasted with happy women who want chads kid. The conversation makes a lot more sense on x where I posted it. I'll probably refine it more. I suppose it's more of a conversation piece I'll evolve as feedback around it changes.
@Vermillion-Rx I don't think it's a Briffault's Law thing, so much as a "bitches be crazy" thing.
By extension, where the female can derive no benefit from association to the male, she perceives no benefit from association with their children as well.
How do you mean that?
It's quite obvious that women can and do benefit by associating with the children. They estrange them from their father and use the children for supply (narcissistic and material, aren't they going to take care of their aging mother?)
For the most part, I have no use for AI since I am retired and never worked in an Industry that utilized it.
I do try to avoid thise AI chat bots tha t are the flavour of the day with some companies. I prefer a Human.
My Daughter's B/F is working on a video game and has conversations with Chat GPT about it, and I wonder if that will lead to his ideas being scraped and used to push out a similar product before he can.
You think this might be one of the unintended consequences of the whole "Men are creeps" campaign that has been ongoing for the past 10+ years?
Unless, of course, it's hot Chad or Tyrone that cold approaches you, then we have tingle time?
Tell me again about all you learned while getting that degree in Woman's Studies.
I'll wait quietly over there ---->
So call the fucking police or make a report
What the hell are you asking us for, are we going to tell you how to get her to stop dating psychos or how to frame mog him?
Seriously. I am locking this post,
Do not make a similar post here. This is AskTRP not tell trp

