RULES
The Hub is moderated for decorum. Please follow these rules while participating in The Hub:
- Be courteous and friendly to new members.
- Do not attempt to scare off new users from using the platform.
- Do advertise your Tribes and invite users to join conversations in them.
- Always Follow Our Content Policy
These rules only apply to The Hub with the exception of the content policy which is site-wide. Please observe individual tribe rules when visiting other tribes.
Sick of Rules? Want to Shit-talk?
Join The Beer Hall
Want a FLAIR next to your name? Send a message to redpillschool. Reasonable requests will be granted.
Have questions? Ask away here!
Join our chatroom for live entertainment.
Red archive is going to be best if that's your goal.
When she starts defining a loser, I realised that she is defining a man who makes women win less, maybe even lose. The man she has defined is in no way necessarily a loser, he is not a simp. He might not be a nice guy but then again he might be a good man who is just not be a simp. Either way he is not by her definition what we would call a loser -a man who loses more than he gains in life or fails at the things that most people should achieve -like respect, a job and reproduction.
So basically she is using loser as a man shaming term.
So based on her definition I hope there are more losers in this world every year. The balance needs addressing. A relationship needs to be about both sides gaining not one side only defining success by them getting their way.
I once read an interesting African English literature text book designed for teaching in an African country. It was full of pieces by African authors. One speculated as to whether a marriage could really be successful if a woman was never told off or punished. Had her husband got the best out of her if she was content? This was a breath of fresh air to me, not because I wanted to punish women but just because it was the opposite side to the one we are taught and seeing it showed me how skewed things have got. Women are actually saying they need it all one way for a man to be good and they are also saying that if a man gets his own way and is not "held to account" by his wife for many of his natural inclinations and his political conscience, then she is a failed doormat and he is probably a criminal. Gentlemen a new world is coming and the ladies are not going to like it. Thanks to the red pill, more losers are on the way.
Read More@Kloi If it's any form of inflammation you need to go really easy on it till it calms the fuck down. Icing and warming (alternating) can help a bit. Glides is a maybe and depends on cause. You need to stop doing things that inflame it, find ways to not irritate whatever is causing the inflammation and not do it again.
Ask a doctor, ask chatgpt, ask claude.
Take this shit seriously.
That is interesting what will happen in thext few dozens of years.
Nations with nuch lower inteligence will replace nations that have invented most deadly weapons in existence, and they will inherit those weapons.
Once the Europe will loose its power I would bet Russia would try to move on, except China is waiting for them to weaken defenses on the N-S side.
This will be tye first war where women will be a direct cause of a collapse. Indirectly caused by men allowing tyem to.
I read how big German companies fail one 1by1. Porsche is bankrupting VW, VW needs to subcobtract tech to China, Mercedes gets engines from China, Bosch divides and moves parts to USA. Law changes Orchestrated by someone that uses Leyen as a German face to push it.
@Bangkok “ This will be tye first war where women will be a direct cause of a collapse.” I’m not even going to bother finding counter examples to this, because it’s basically all wars.
You know, I am starting to see services like egg freezing to be borderline unethical.
Not because I am some sort of religious fundamentalist or anything like that.
But because it being available clearly gives women the retarded notion that they can fuck around forever.
Spouse no, girlfriends yes. I've even had plates pry into my personal journals/notes.
None of them have reacted negatively, most of them have pushed the thoughts verbally but concluded my line of thought was correct but feels inappropriate.
As for testing, mehhhh. More so calibrating my own game with each passing relationship I get a little softer/give less fucks without being such an ass about it.
Yes it is a defence mechanism against being cuckolded.
It is also because most women will tell you that every man they sleep with takes a piece of them for good. (All the women I have lain with have told me this anyway). Women are supposed to pair bond strongly by sex but this is weakened with each partner she has and fails with, so women who have a lot of sex are poor at pair bonding.
Women will compare you to other men they have had in a wide range of fields. Because they are programmed to always want better, once the new wears off you, they will feel they failed themselves when they gave themsleves to you.
There is some evidence that every man who jizzes in a woman can make chimeras with her own DNA, so changing her. Its probbaly not a big effect but it is a real one.
6h ago Ask TRP Forum
Question on body count
What is it that many men find so disgusting about when a woman we like for more than just sex has a high body count? I really don't like it at all myself and I cannot pinpoint why. I'm talking about cases when you have a high degree or certainty that she is invested in you exclusively and wants no one else, but her past is dense. I heard about evolutionary biology linking promiscuity to parenthood uncertainty and thus a defense mechanism akin to fear of heights, insecurity by comparison with past partners, statistics correlating divorce and whatnot that most people are not aware of, ... it's something more visceral. Any wisdom?
Read More“ you have a high degree or certainty that she is invested in you exclusively” you are simply wrong about this. At best, she is interested in what a monogamous lifestyle has to offer now that she’s fucked everyone she finds attractive. She is not interested in “you exclusively” but that lifestyle. However, she will eventually reminisce about the fun she used to have and will be more likely to cheat on you in the future as there are clearly fewer barriers in her mind for spreading her legs than there would be for a less-promiscuous woman. That doesn’t mean she WILL cheat, but she is more likely to. The pair bond will also likely be weaker, as you are one of many. If you stop meeting her fantasy requirements for an ideal monogamous relationship, the pairing will fail more easily. Evolutionary biology likes to avoid bad odds.
Read More