RULES
The Hub is moderated for decorum. Please follow these rules while participating in The Hub:
- Be courteous and friendly to new members.
- Do not attempt to scare off new users from using the platform.
- Do advertise your Tribes and invite users to join conversations in them.
- Always Follow Our Content Policy
These rules only apply to The Hub with the exception of the content policy which is site-wide. Please observe individual tribe rules when visiting other tribes.
Sick of Rules? Want to Shit-talk?
Join The Beer Hall
Want a FLAIR next to your name? Send a message to redpillschool. Reasonable requests will be granted.
Have questions? Ask away here!
Join our chatroom for live entertainment.
From Brave's AI:
No, you cannot send direct messages to someone on Venmo without initiating a transaction.
According to user discussions on Reddit, Venmo does not have a standalone messaging feature for non-transactional communication. To contact someone, you must use one of the following methods:
Send a small payment with a note: You can transfer a minimal amount (e.g., $0.01) and include your message in the transaction note.
Send a payment request: You can send a request for money (even if intended to be ignored or declined) and attach a message, which the recipient can see.
Comment on a past transaction: If you have an existing transaction history with the person, you can comment on that specific completed transaction.
Venmo’s design is strictly financial; any communication is embedded within the context of a payment, request, or transaction comment.
Send a payment request: You can send a request for money (even if intended to be ignored or declined) and attach a message, which the recipient can see.
I'm going to send these dumb twats payment requests, saying something like "you should pay me for inflicting that stupid birthday request upon my eyeballs. That'll be $20".
Read MoreMost women do not understand that the grass is green where they water it
The grass is greenest above the septic tank.
@First-light in case it wasn't clear, my reply was to him in particular. He's still a free man.
But yeah, this sucks big time for men like you. It's fucked up.
I mean, I knew there were risks when I got married. I didn't realize just what a bad deal for men it really is, but I still freely chose this. You made choices to avoid this, and your government is fixing to assrape you as if you had gotten married all along.
As if your government hasn't assraped the native Brits enough already.
You're going by the blue pilled definition of hypergamy, again, which only focuses on the beta bucks aspect.
Hypergamy as defined by RP and evolutionary psychology is a woman wanting a man who is above her in every possible way. This includes alpha fucks and beta bucks. Most blue pilled discussion completely ignores the alpha fucks aspect.
Some other corrections:
women's hypergamy is a philosophy
Its origin is instinct. It's biological. They can't help having it.
However, they can help what they do about it.
but also a strategy that, even when successful, requires a denial of love
Not quite.
When you're a woman's hypergamous best option, she will love you. But beware that women are incapable of loving men the way men love women. As Rollo says so frequently, men love idealistically while women love opportunistically.
It's also why when a woman no longer views her man as her hypergamous best option, the man will experience the light switch effect. It'll be as though she never loved him in the first place.
They operate based on their instincts and their emotions. Facts don't matter.
facts are a tool of the patriarchy!
Anyway, a few illustrative examples of women still practicing hypergamy while marrying a man who makes less than they do:
1) I was junior enlisted when I met my wife. She brought in more money than me. I left her in the dust when I became an officer, then fell behind for a few years after getting out of the Army. I have since left her in the dust in my trade.
2) one of my mentors in this trade is married to a stockbroker. He makes bank, but her income blows his out of the water
3) one of my colleagues in this trade is married to a PhD research scientist. He makes bank, but she makes significantly more.
What do all 3 of us have in common that these women were willing to marry men who made less?
1) I'm the shortest at 5' 11". Both of these other dudes are well over 6'.
2) all 3 of is are charming as hell. The mentor dude is likely the least charming of the 3 of us, but still above average in charm.
3) all 3 of us exude ZFG energy.
Hypergamy can be satisfied without the man earning more. Hell, sometimes the man can even be a bum. Oprah has had Steadman living at her expense for decades now.
Oh, and the entitled physician inspin who inspired your post? She still seeks above her level in the alpha fucks category as well. Hell, I don't even meet her demands as a 5' 11" midget, but I'm still above her.
Read MoreThese are the only women who get it. Them, and the ones you hear about who take over a male friend's dating profile to try to help him because they think the guy must be doing something wrong.
@Typo-MAGAshiv Yeah but when you want kids its an invidious choice. The law should allow men to be the best father they can without facing terrible consequences. We need to fight this not just say "too bad losers"
I cohabit for the daughter I share with my lady. I did this thinking I would be safe I case of a break up and I chose to allow my daughter's mother to freeload off me for my daughter's sake. This position is already a net loss to me. Sex, housework and cooking (some grudging) do not equate in value to a free home and bills and food.
This is not a nice thing to have to write but I will review my position if this is passed as law. Sorry but that is how it is.
The big socialist state will eat us all if we let it.
Bozza has alerted us to something very serious. The UK government intends to legislate to mean that live in girlfriends can take your house, money, income and pension in the same way that wives can on breakup.
The last time the UK had a labour government they had a consultation about it and decided it would be unfair to legislate in this way. This time they are consulting again. The Fabian Society want this. It will happen if we don't stand up to it.
Please spread this link to all men you know (and wealthy women with live in boyfriends)
consult.justice.gov.uk/digital-communications/a-fairer-end-to-relationships-consultation/
Fill in the form. Tell them to go to hell. It just might prevent a huge erosion of men's rights. The form does not appear to check up on who you are so just fill it in and tell them to shove it. This would be a huge grab of power by the big state.
Marriage is widely available for those who want it. Those who choose not to marry do so because they do not want the legal consequences. To then suddenly force them on millions of couples is grossly unfair.
Of course it is better personally not to cohabit but many men have chosen to do so for the sake of their children. To make them vulnerable when they have made a choice altruistically would be a gross miscarriage of justice.
Read More32m ago 2026-06-06 16:34:58 WhereAreAllTheGoodMen Forum
I used Brave search to convert 2 crores to USD. It was mere pennies, so that can't be right. Can someone more worldly and well-traveled than me (*cough @Land_of_the_losers *cough) give us a better idea of how much this is?
Anyway, this is hilarious. These women have no idea what men want or what men value, and they don't care. It's just "I want I want I want I want I WANT!!!"
enjoy your career! It's all you have, and all you are.
