RULES
The Hub is moderated for decorum. Please follow these rules while participating in The Hub:
- Be courteous and friendly to new members.
- Do not attempt to scare off new users from using the platform.
- Do advertise your Tribes and invite users to join conversations in them.
- Always Follow Our Content Policy
These rules only apply to The Hub with the exception of the content policy which is site-wide. Please observe individual tribe rules when visiting other tribes.
Sick of Rules? Want to Shit-talk?
Join The Beer Hall
Want a FLAIR next to your name? Send a message to redpillschool. Reasonable requests will be granted.
Have questions? Ask away here!
Join our chatroom for live entertainment.
@Bozza 100%! Great link, I’ve been catching up on Mandelson this evening too. Blair and Mandelson, both names in the files and ran in those circles, and Starmer’s government has a Blairite continuity agenda. Starmer appointed Mandelson as US Ambassador because of his links to those circles - which was cynical as fuck but applauded by the media as a great move to keep Trump friendly while he dished out the tariffs. And Blair was just invited and accepted a position on the “Gaza peace board”. Keeping everyone close in these turbulent times no doubt.
Andrew and Mandelson are certainly the sacrificial lambs, though. The chum for the masses to sink their teeth into while the other names slink off into the shadows unscathed. Elizabeth bunged millions to try and hide Andrew’s involvement, Charles would have known. Sarah Ferguson knew, and continued to email Ghislaine and Epstein after his initial conviction. You bet your fucking arse the crown is compromised and Westminster too.
It is absolutely insane how deep this rabbit hole goes. We need a zealous purge of the entire establishment.
Also, Bannon and Epstein worked to get Boris in and that money continues to now push for Farage (see the establishment morning itself into reform?)
Run, man. Run.
Read More@Stigma Rothschild group was subject to a tax investigation in 2015. Epstein had very high up government connections. Someone like him is useful when facing tax issues. Not sure what you think this document represents. It's like hiring Eric Holder for a legal matter when having someone on the legal team with certain political connections would be useful.
@Stigma I've thought this for a while, but especially in light of these recently releases I'm convinced that this is magnitudes larger.
I'll draw your attention to the Westminster paedophile dossier.
I know this is more UK focussed, and it dates back to the 1980s. But have a read through that in light of what has just been released. All starts to make a lot more sense.
Links to the British parliament - we'll we've seen how Peter Mandleson has suddenly come under the spotlight. Likewise the Royal family - prince andrew...
I have no doubt that this an Epstein have some crossover. This goes back a lot further and goes a lot deeper than we are currently aware.
@Stigma He was already rich in 2015. It appears he was some kind of spy or arms dealer. Otherwise, Robert Mueller wouldn't have been involved when Epstein first got in trouble with the authorities in FL. But in any event, info like that won't be in the files of some schlub at the FBI, or any files for that matter.
Rothschild should consider hiring attorneys that don't misspell its name in contracts (fourth line). That aside, ostensibly this agreement is for consulting services in connection with a tax investigation the group was facing at the time. Hardly some smoking gun, as Epstein was putatively some kind of financial advisor.
He was already rich in 2015
Right? You think you get a contract with the Rothschilds in 2015 for $25m as your first ever go at it? Why do I need to point out the inference that this is their middle history? Where Epstein comes from and his motivations are also published.
The other, to my mind, clear inference is who the money is circulating around - I can't sit here and spoon feed every single implication, at some point you're going to have to find the narrative thread yourself.
@Typo-MAGAshiv a very pathetic cope. Honestly far beneath you. The name Trump appears literally thousands of times in the Epstein Files. Trump made releasing these and draining the swamp into pillars of his campaigns.
MAGA is looking totally pathetic and by conspicuous omission, bordering on complicit in covering for these crimes.
Running down the feed of Fox and all the big name Right Wing commentators, the name Epstein is conspicuously absent. The only ones who mentioned the Files at all over the last few days were Ben Shapiro and Officer Tatum, AKA AIPAC Shakur. Both of these mealy mouthed fucks tried to spin the latest file dumps as completely exonerating Trump, and totally owning The Libs. In other words, shallow partisan feel good slop with no connection to reality.
They didn't use the Epstein files against him, because there's nothing to it at far as he's concerned, and their own guys come out looking far worse.
- Mutually assured destruction
We've been over that before, they've kicked this football between themselves for a decade or so.
-
Why flip flop on the files then?
-
Why not release all of them?
- Why delete files mentioning Trump?
No really, he and (by proxy) his supporters need to pick a lane. There's still 3 million documents not released, claiming he is exonerated (parroting his words) is laughable.
