RULES
The Hub is moderated for decorum. Please follow these rules while participating in The Hub:
- Be courteous and friendly to new members.
- Do not attempt to scare off new users from using the platform.
- Do advertise your Tribes and invite users to join conversations in them.
- Always Follow Our Content Policy
These rules only apply to The Hub with the exception of the content policy which is site-wide. Please observe individual tribe rules when visiting other tribes.
Sick of Rules? Want to Shit-talk?
Join The Beer Hall
Want a FLAIR next to your name? Send a message to redpillschool. Reasonable requests will be granted.
Have questions? Ask away here!
Join our chatroom for live entertainment.
And how would missing her medication be anyone's responsibility except her own?
Is there prior history of her failing to take medication which results in, I would presume, a manic episode?
It would be interesting to see if she is preemptively banned from flying any other airline and put on the "Terrorist" list so she gets flagged by TSA.
I just realized you can make it so you can double tap the lock button on android to voice record
I've always wondered how to get something like this to happen and never could.
This is incredibly clutch if you have to subtly protect yourself without alerting the other person to that you have started getting evidence
Settings > advanced features > double press
Not sure if this is android or just a Samsung feature
I'll find it later. I don't remember how I got to it
Good questions, and presumably relevant. I suspect she’ll be permanently banned from Delta as a matter of course. Whether the rest of the airlines ban her probably depends on what the TSA does… she might just go on the government no-fly list, and the point would become moot.
I actually feel bad for her: I’m sure that none of this was intentional. Nobody ASKS to have psychosis, and getting your meds scrambled when the whole purpose of the meds is to prevent you from getting things scrambled is sort-of a Catch-22.
My point is that if we’re going to excuse her - perhaps with future restrictions commensurate with her condition - then that should apply to everyone equally. But since a person who is not 1) wealthy, 2) famous, 3) reasonably attractive, 4) Caucasian and, most importantly 5) female, would receive a much more deleterious outcome than Ms Blair is likely to receive, we have a problem. Lady Justice is supposed to be blindfolded, but she’s not. Which brings us back to what those outcomes will be.
We know that she’s already gotten a level of kid-gloves treatment that would not be afforded to any of us under identical circumstances, so we’re off to a bad start.
I’m not in favor of the legal system dropping a metaphorical brick on her head because she is who she is. Crushing her wouldn’t serve as reparations for men who get mauled by the system… I would just like to see men get the same treatment.
Until they do, we have to decide whether women are adults and act accordingly.
Read MoreActress Selma Blair tried to open an airplane door in-flight, then attacked a flight attendant, a cop, and a nurse. Blood shedding and bites ensued, along with federal and state charges. Her lawyer claims that she experienced a medical emergency brought on by missing her meds. Her bond was set comically low, and she left the courthouse with her lawyer. If any of us had done that we would be in Riker’s indefinitely.
Women VS Accountability
So women can dodge accountability by virtue of not taking something they should have taken (The Lindsey Clancy Defense), and also for taking something they shouldn’t have taken (The Lucy Craig Defense). Needless to say, nobody (least of all an icky MAN), can have control over what a woman ingests or fails to ingest.
I really wish feminists would just pick a lane. Either women are adults with full agency who should be required to accept full responsibility for their actions, or they are not, in which case they should have significant limits on their autonomy.
www.newsnationnow.com/entertainment-news/selma-blair-delta-flight-attendants-fight/amp/
Read MoreFrom the Don't stick your dick in crazy files. Woman commits act of domestic violence before witnesses, lies to cops who see through her bullshit, then freaks out and collects 10 ADDITIONAL charges during her arrest process. The poor sap who has a young child with her struggles to make peace, but in vain as she has clinical level psychological issues.
Brother, you get a limited time on this earth. Spend some of it around women you enjoy. If you're thinking about starting a relationship, just do it. You wouldn't be questioning us if you weren't leaning heavily towards that.
An LTR is just two people that agree on rules of conduct. It's a label. And the connection is what matters, not the label.
Here's the truth: as long as you don't cohabitate or have a kid, you can change your mind at any time. Enjoy your time with her. If it doesn't work out, onto the next.
I think there can be a danger in unnecessarily playing women in these situations. Do you want to try for a long term relationship with this woman? That is all you really need to ask yourself. Is it worth saying you will see only her in return for her saying she will see only you? That's all it comes down to. Its not a contract with a fixed term. Either of you can end it when you like, its just a statement of how you intend to operate.
Women don't forget negative things. Early on in a relationship inertia, falling in love and fear of losing will cause them to put up with a lot to keep you. That tolerance decreases over time but the scars it leaves remain permanent. Its not a problem if you are looking for short term stuff -you can make her do lots of stuff to try to win you- but the effect of the scars kicks in past a couple of years and only increases over time.
My advice is that unless you are seeing or at least pursuing other girls and getting lots of satisfaction out of it, you have little to lose by agreeing exclusivity with her. Its not like you can't end it if you want. If however, you string her along with wanting to keep options open she will remember it. It will be OK if its a brief stage that she comes out of with a win but if it remains a long term sore in the relationship it won't be.
Also consider what you are doing if you make it a stage that she has to win. At first she is miserable and doubts you, then when you cave in, you have just proved that pestering, nagging and crying work on you. Her next target for the pester power may be an engagement ring. Caving in under long term pressure is a weak move. Saying after a short time that you you didn't want to be pushed but now you have made a decision that you you value her enough to want to be exclusive is a slightly stronger position.
One sided monogamy is perfectly possible but as someone who did it for some years, I can say it is not the same sort of relationship. They know there are limits and rivals. They hold something back and you hold something back -in both cases by necessity. By all means try it but its probably best to have had normal LTRs first. You also need to be sure that you are making the women a good offer -if its not above what they could normally expect from an exclusive LTR, why would they accept it except in the early stages when they have fallen in love and hope to win you?
Everyone likes to know where they stand. Its OK to wait to be exclusive before entering a relationship but if you dangle exclusivity out there like a carrot for a long time, while acting like you are in a relationship, its unnecessarily unsettling. She doesn't know if she is a girl friend or a plate. If she only wants to be a girlfriend that makes her ask "Is she a fool?" and "Is he just very selfish?"
Read More