@Bozza

Look, I'm somewhat open to using Claude maybe at some point but I think them having the AI code itself is eventually going to be a serious issue.

All I am saying is I already see the writing on the wall with Claude.

I honestly barely trust it now and I don't trust it long term. The CEO appears to be much more concerned with progress than ethics.

Even though grok isn't as advanced or as good as Claude atm I trust it a lot more and expect it to get much better in the AI race especially with how young it is compared to competing predecessors

@Vermillion-Rx read*

@Vermillion-Rx

I trust Grok more. But please my tirade I wrote on AI.

Add the OOM's and they can outpaces humans - see here.

Given OpenBSD, one of the, if not THE most secure operating system written by humans.

The latest Claude model found critical vulnerabilities in the operating system - dating back 20 YEARS.

People on their Macbook Pro's will have this capability within < 1 year.

Anthropic's decision not to release the weights of their most capable model, reportedly because it's considered too powerful to release openly [5] shows the bind perfectly. Release it and lose control entirely. Withhold it and the open-source community replicates it within a year regardless.

tech-insider.org/anthropic-claude-mythos-zero-day-project-glasswing-2026/

The second is more unsettling. Those guardrails only exist because the companies control more compute than anyone else. Once equivalent capability is available open-source - and we're clearly there now, with models like Llama and Mistral reaching near-parity with first-gen frontier models [2] [3] - they simply don't apply. Anyone can remove or ignore them.

Or more specifically, Gemma 4.

lmstudio.ai/models/gemma-4

I read this when it came out, 2023/23? and I thought this was nonsense.

And yet we are in 2026/27.

The OOM's he described have been met (later than thought, but barely). And We have Microsoft, Google, OpenAI not only buying Gigawatss of power but building their own power stations to their datacentres.

Now at this point I must provide a contrary voice - The Enshittifinancial Crisis

Again, a very long read. Which I believe to be entirely true.

But even based on the above, I think the forward motion genie cannot be put back in the bottle.

I think the next 10 years will be the most turbulent in history.

@Stigma

using Claude

I recall @Bozza talking about Claude in the tribe for this year's April ool's joke, and @Vermillion-Rx talking abut not trusting it in the same tribe.

I don't think I'll be trusting any of those things with anything important, ever. Maybe for speeding up research, but I still would want to verify results myself.

Fuck, I remember reading about some law firm using AI (forget which one) to research a case, and it just made shit up. Cost them millions to fix things after they trusted it and ran with its results.

@Typo-MAGAshiv

I think there are legitimate complaints about how he conducts his image and some of the things he says but I do follow him on X

I would say the overwhelming majority of his videos he puts out (minus him gloating about his wealth and calling everyone else a loser) are actually about men improving their lives and how to do it

He objectively has more to offer than a lot of red pill authors out there in my opinion. I haven't tried his Real World community yet but I plan to check it out at some point for a month or so just for curiosity sake

Most of the content I see from him is objectively inspirational or useful

I'd highly recommend reading through Situational Awareness

It's a very long read. And while he may have been a tad optimistic, his prediction aren't really that far out from what has been achieved.