RULES
The Hub is moderated for decorum. Please follow these rules while participating in The Hub:
- Be courteous and friendly to new members.
- Do not attempt to scare off new users from using the platform.
- Do advertise your Tribes and invite users to join conversations in them.
- Always Follow Our Content Policy
These rules only apply to The Hub with the exception of the content policy which is site-wide. Please observe individual tribe rules when visiting other tribes.
Sick of Rules? Want to Shit-talk?
Join The Beer Hall
Want a FLAIR next to your name? Send a message to redpillschool. Reasonable requests will be granted.
Have questions? Ask away here!
Join our chatroom for live entertainment.
Back in the day I thought we should have a Mrs Archwinger appreciation day.
As the alchemists showed, unsolvable problems contributed majorly to the advance of human knowledge.
I like how @Kloi sums up the current state of affairs.
What's left out, though, is men's need for love. (Men need love but can't find it, because women are incapable of it, while women find love but can't feel content because they are gluttonous by nature).
Until 100 years ago, a man was supposed to enter marriage with a woman after he made her submitt. The taming of the shrew was a prerequisite.
Now, capitalism has found that it can squeeze more surplus out of the family if it constantly excites the shrew. There's no reprieve for the man. (Typo, you've read Esther Vilar's second book, The polygamous sex, right? It's a bit dated, no evopsych back then, but it's impressive how she is able to grasp the gist of the difference in male/female love using 70s sociological notions and a humanitarian perspective).
The sad fact is that a relationship that is not supposed to last "till death do us part" necessarily turns into an antagonism of who can extract the most out of it. And women, having a more integrated psychopathic mode, are more equipped for that.
Read MoreHypergamy wouldn't exist if all men were in the top 10%. DUH.
@SwarmShawarma and I'm a fucking aircraft carrier and its accompanying fleet, laughing at your adrift primitive broke ass
It is not volume of speech, but precision of character, that commands respect.
This is what it feels like when you haven't visited trp.red in a while:
This is a sign that things have actually come a long way. The author does not fully understand the concept of hypergamy but she does know it exists.
He answer to hypergamy is -hypergamy. Well of course, what else is a girl to do? The solution is more masculine men, the cream of the crop of current men are masculine enough, that is what a girl wants. That's right love, that's hypergamy.
I do wonder what most women would do with a more masculine man with more testosterone? Those qualities of drive, energy, strength, focus, courage decisiveness and so on that she admires can be turned towards a woman -usually in acquisition- but they are primarily the man's. Such a man has less need of a woman, more options, less need to please her, more desire to go out and find adventure, less fear of letting her know he is displeased. Its not likely to result in him taking her shopping more at weekends anyway. One doubts more manly men would be voting for as much feminism and free shit to be given out as weak men.
Read MoreOn that day, it really won't help to have a lot of useless tattoos that looked a bit better on a young body that everyone wanted but which are now saggy and dated. If that was her hand, what other delights will her (now scarcer) lovers see?
But the reality gives me a "yeah, no thanks" feeling.
Absolute truth, just not in the way she thinks. Reality is saying "no thanks" to her. She's 20 years too old to be making much in the way of demands for a dancing monkey. She's just too stupid or arrogant to be able to read the memo she is getting in the form of men who feel no need to make an effort to crack open her dead egg filled tomb.
