RULES
The Hub is moderated for decorum. Please follow these rules while participating in The Hub:
- Be courteous and friendly to new members.
- Do not attempt to scare off new users from using the platform.
- Do advertise your Tribes and invite users to join conversations in them.
- Always Follow Our Content Policy
These rules only apply to The Hub with the exception of the content policy which is site-wide. Please observe individual tribe rules when visiting other tribes.
Sick of Rules? Want to Shit-talk?
Join The Beer Hall
Want a FLAIR next to your name? Send a message to redpillschool. Reasonable requests will be granted.
Have questions? Ask away here!
Join our chatroom for live entertainment.
From Brave's AI:
No, you cannot send direct messages to someone on Venmo without initiating a transaction.
According to user discussions on Reddit, Venmo does not have a standalone messaging feature for non-transactional communication. To contact someone, you must use one of the following methods:
Send a small payment with a note: You can transfer a minimal amount (e.g., $0.01) and include your message in the transaction note.
Send a payment request: You can send a request for money (even if intended to be ignored or declined) and attach a message, which the recipient can see.
Comment on a past transaction: If you have an existing transaction history with the person, you can comment on that specific completed transaction.
Venmo’s design is strictly financial; any communication is embedded within the context of a payment, request, or transaction comment.
Send a payment request: You can send a request for money (even if intended to be ignored or declined) and attach a message, which the recipient can see.
I'm going to send these dumb twats payment requests, saying something like "you should pay me for inflicting that stupid birthday request upon my eyeballs. That'll be $20".
Read MoreMost women do not understand that the grass is green where they water it
The grass is greenest above the septic tank.
@First-light in case it wasn't clear, my reply was to him in particular. He's still a free man.
But yeah, this sucks big time for men like you. It's fucked up.
I mean, I knew there were risks when I got married. I didn't realize just what a bad deal for men it really is, but I still freely chose this. You made choices to avoid this, and your government is fixing to assrape you as if you had gotten married all along.
As if your government hasn't assraped the native Brits enough already.
@Typo-MAGAshiv Yeah but when you want kids its an invidious choice. The law should allow men to be the best father they can without facing terrible consequences. We need to fight this not just say "too bad losers"
I cohabit for the daughter I share with my lady. I did this thinking I would be safe I case of a break up and I chose to allow my daughter's mother to freeload off me for my daughter's sake. This position is already a net loss to me. Sex, housework and cooking (some grudging) do not equate in value to a free home and bills and food.
This is not a nice thing to have to write but I will review my position if this is passed as law. Sorry but that is how it is.
The big socialist state will eat us all if we let it.
Bozza has alerted us to something very serious. The UK government intends to legislate to mean that live in girlfriends can take your house, money, income and pension in the same way that wives can on breakup.
The last time the UK had a labour government they had a consultation about it and decided it would be unfair to legislate in this way. This time they are consulting again. The Fabian Society want this. It will happen if we don't stand up to it.
Please spread this link to all men you know (and wealthy women with live in boyfriends)
consult.justice.gov.uk/digital-communications/a-fairer-end-to-relationships-consultation/
Fill in the form. Tell them to go to hell. It just might prevent a huge erosion of men's rights. The form does not appear to check up on who you are so just fill it in and tell them to shove it. This would be a huge grab of power by the big state.
Marriage is widely available for those who want it. Those who choose not to marry do so because they do not want the legal consequences. To then suddenly force them on millions of couples is grossly unfair.
Of course it is better personally not to cohabit but many men have chosen to do so for the sake of their children. To make them vulnerable when they have made a choice altruistically would be a gross miscarriage of justice.
Read MoreOK, now that I've commented as a commenter, mod duties call.
Dude. You keep running afoul of WATGMA's rule 3:
Submissions must be an essay which addresses the "Where are all the good men?" subject. Personal stories, theories, venting, and even how awesome life is as a MGTOW are all welcomed, but ultimately the reader should be able to understand from your perspective why women can't find a "good man", or why good men are avoiding commitment.
Please edit something in that addresses this.
Also, for future reference, if you have something that you feel an urgent need to say but can't think of how to tie it in to this requirement at WATGMA, consider if maybe it fits at TheRedPill forum instead.
These are the only women who get it. Them, and the ones you hear about who take over a male friend's dating profile to try to help him because they think the guy must be doing something wrong.
Even if it's not 100% rapport then hi for your looksmatch and value match and then do rapport
