@firmware_pimp

Greetings fellow agents-provocateur and CIA forum-managers, just catching up here!

In relation to UAP, I'd like to point out:

• Almost everybody discussing them seems to have ties to intelligence
• Side-by-side red and green lights in the distance can look like an orange light
• All the UAP footage is relatively easily reproduced even with very low-cost Chinese drones
• Based on the fact that the drones mostly appear on military bases, I think we can infer that the drones are actually coming from the bases
• Mysteriously, none of the bases have released any high-quality footage of the drones/UAP, despite obviously having high-quality surveillance equipment, yet they make public statements essentially confirming the drone/UAP sightings

• Some fighter pilots and navy admirals are claiming, in general, that it's not policy to surprise anyone on training missions with e.g. unexpected phenomena. I find this to be pretty hard to believe. Every training mission is set up to go "according to plan" in the military? Really? If my memory is correct, both David Fravor and Tim Gallaudet have made this claim. This seems to be one of their main arguments against "it isn't ours", and it feels like a flimsy denial.

  Why is this happening? It feels mildly blue-beam-ish, but at the same time, it seems weirdly low-effort. I don't actually think airbases are flying around cheap drones in order to convince the public that there's a real alien threat. At most, it feels like muddying the waters in some way.

They're clearly not advanced extraterrestrial craft. Aliens advanced enough to cross the expanse of space would have no reason to be concerned about avoiding collisions with human made aircraft, nor would any nations military allow unauthorized aircraft in their airspace without air authority scheduling and permission. They're most likely all U.S. military drones belonging to either the Air Force, or Space Force, conducting specific drills. Most likely prepping for a potential dirty bomb or chemical weapon situation at military bases, shipping hubs, and airports.

@Stigma Speak up against this whenever opportunity to arises. Time was, people were afraid of being called "an antisemite" if they spoke against Israel in any way. Israel and its allies and minions have pretty much ruined that condition they enjoyed for decades. A good deflection: "I'm not against Jews, I'm against Zionists!"

I was thinking earlier how not too long ago in American history, "being Jewish" was used to actively discriminate against individuals and groups. You might miss a promotion or get excluded from certain country clubs for "being Jewish." Now that is flipped on its head. High level celebrities and executives along with average Joes can lose their job or get kicked out of universities with no refund on their 5-6 figure tuition for speaking up against literally anything Israel does or uttering the words "Free Palestine."

Trump has been making waves talking about annexing Mexico, Canada, the Panama Canal, and Greenland. This has predictably set off a flurry of discussion and hand-wringing.

Hot take: these are non-starters and even Trump realizes this. What people are NOT talking about when focused on Trump and his (patently stupid) remarks is the fact that Israel is currently actively and openly annexing parts of Gaza, Syria, and Lebanon that are internationally recognized as NOT belonging to Israel. Trump and most of Congress are openly funded in the hundreds of millions of dollars by Israeli interests like Aipac and Miriam Adelson, so the financial connection thus incentive structure stands out clear and in the open, not some murky conspiracy "theory" that relies on stacks of conjecture and unsupported assumptions.