RULES
The Hub is moderated for decorum. Please follow these rules while participating in The Hub:
- Be courteous and friendly to new members.
- Do not attempt to scare off new users from using the platform.
- Do advertise your Tribes and invite users to join conversations in them.
- Always Follow Our Content Policy
These rules only apply to The Hub with the exception of the content policy which is site-wide. Please observe individual tribe rules when visiting other tribes.
Sick of Rules? Want to Shit-talk?
Join The Beer Hall
Want a FLAIR next to your name? Send a message to redpillschool. Reasonable requests will be granted.
Have questions? Ask away here!
Join our chatroom for live entertainment.
@First-light it's kind of what I've been doing in the past decade.
Bits and pieces of what's up are circulating in the Manosphere, but I believe it's not easy for a guy to put it all together. There's too much noise and special cases, and it's a struggle to grasp what's essential. Like Rollo, I too just put the pieces of the puzzle together.
But yes, I'll get some posts out, and see how this goes. First I have in mind is around the seemingly neverending debate about "Alphas" and "Betas".
@Vermillion-Rx I might lean towards it being schemata that they have hard wired in of how conflict goes, how "men" act and react. This is how it goes in conflict for them.
Men too need to guard against this. The AWALT of blind adherence to MGTOW is sometimes an easy shield to hide behind. As is the "I push the female buttons and standard female behaviour comes out" that is more of a blind error in Red Pill men.
However, past baggage more a female thing. The landscape of women's minds is made of softer stuff. The floods of storms scour grooves in their minds easily. Its one reason the cock carousel is so damaging to them. They can become like a damaged record where the needle jumps round the same groove, running from novel intensity to boredom to frustration and back. It is also a risk when it comes to arguing hard with a LTR. She takes that conflict inside. Long after you have moved on the hamster is still running the same wrong loop.
Read More@adam-l Perhaps, don't try to write it all in one book then?
A successful academic once told me that at university he had realised his teachers were wrong about something but he would never get published if he tried to tell them it as an undergraduate. Instead, as a post grad, he wrote one paper after grounded in the current orthodoxy and another hinting at the truth. Each paper revealing a different aspect of where he really wanted to go. When he had a successful academic career and was respected as an authority in his field, he then published the ground breaking revision based on al of his by then fully accepted papers. He had known this truth since being an undergraduate but they only listened when he was already a professor. Then he was suddenly the ground breaking genius.
It will be a better book if it is carefully distilled drop by drop and it will be better received if it is turned over a few years in the cask of the manosphere -long enough to take on the background flavours but not to long enough to lose its spirit.
I would write a few short works to the manosphere, get liked and then write the grand unified thoery.
Read MorePerhaps, don't try to write it all in one book then?
Heh, Rian Stone started out intending to write "Dread", but soon realized the chapters on frame were so large that it was becoming its own book. You can't run dread without frame, so he published "Praxeology Volume 1: Frame" first and then "Praxeology Volume 2: Dread" a year later.
[professor story]
Trickle truth used in a way that is both prudent and ethical!
First I have in mind is around the seemingly neverending debate about "Alphas" and "Betas".
I've been mulling over some similar material in my mind.
No matter which of us gets his posted first, I look forward to seeing yours, and I'm still going to post mine.
I will say this: I wish none of that Greek letter bullshit ever took off the way it did. I was saying it was stupid on Roosh's PUA forum back in 2000.
;The philosophy and discipline was polar opposite of Mr. Miyagi style
I haven't seen "The Karate Kid" since I was a child. The gist of what I recall about Mr. Miyagi was he made Daniel do chores, but in a way that the movements mimicked the basic blocks.
After Daniel started calling BS and saying that he was supposed to be learning karate and not just providing free labor, Mr. Miyagi demonstrated with him that the movements were the basic blocks (which Daniel should have already known, given all the books he had read about karate).
I don't remember much else about "discipline and philosophy" from that movie (I think I last watched it in the early 1990s on VHS with my instructor at his dojo), so I'm not sure what you're trying to say.
All the school bullies seemed to enroll there, and loved inflicting their moves on weaker defenseless kids just trying to mind their own business.
That sucks. I guarantee that if the instructors were worth a shit, they'd have put a stop to it.
When my mom told my instructor that I was bullying my two younger brothers (which was truly awful of me, considering how much I had been bullied in school and how much I hated it, and it was part of why I was in karate in the first place), my instructor declared it sparring night, but instead of the usual rotation of opponents, I spent the next hour getting my ass kicked by the instructor. Badly.
He was a good instructor. I stopped bullying. I also learned I was better than I thought, as when I stopped being scared and started fighting back, I got a few good hits in (including a back kick out of sheer desperation that got him in the groin).
Did those instructors never find out they were assisting bullies in becoming more effective?
And did any of the bullies ever steal your crush? (I had to ask before Vermy did)
Read More
