RULES
The Hub is moderated for decorum. Please follow these rules while participating in The Hub:
- Be courteous and friendly to new members.
- Do not attempt to scare off new users from using the platform.
- Do advertise your Tribes and invite users to join conversations in them.
- Always Follow Our Content Policy
These rules only apply to The Hub with the exception of the content policy which is site-wide. Please observe individual tribe rules when visiting other tribes.
Sick of Rules? Want to Shit-talk?
Join The Beer Hall
Want a FLAIR next to your name? Send a message to redpillschool. Reasonable requests will be granted.
Have questions? Ask away here!
Join our chatroom for live entertainment.
I don't take women's word at all if they say "conservative" unless they prove it
At least she didn't say "traditional" which almost no woman is and that word has lost all meaning
World leaders at the 2012 G8 Summit in Camp David were watching the UEFA Champions League final (Chelsea vs. Bayern Munich).
Chelsea won on penalties - so David Cameron (UK) celebrates wildly with arms raised, Obama cheers, while Merke/ (German) looks less thrilled.
(White House photo by Pete Souza)
I didn't really care too much for his "super empath" wording but his description of the narcissist psychology and their meeting a person with a fair amount of depth and rapport did make sense to me
I haven't heard of what you described, I have noticed narcs tend to date eachother often (the "toxic" relationship) that often gets talked about
I have noticed that narcs getting incredibly intoxicated on people with depth to their character but low enough self esteem to latch on
I find the more one respects themselves and loves themselves the tactics of the narc never really appeal to the self-loving deep person
As for the video you posted, I watched the first half... It seems there's an idealisation of the "super empath" there. In psychoanalytic discourse it's described as the narcissist - borderline couple. The borderline, the "super empath", is considered more primitive in their psychological development than the narcissist. But that's a long discussion...
@Vermillion-Rx Women are residents of the Borderland. It's not quite madness, yet not quite logic.
It's not that I haven't met women who function "rationally". It's that they are very easy to lose it, and then the underlying Borderland reveals itself. It's quite visible when a group of women emotes: logic doesn't enter that picture at all.
At this point in my thinking, I consider all women to be borderlines. The distinction is between the clinical cases and the high-functioning ones.
See any good movie about borderlines, e.g. Prozac Nation, Fatal Attraction, Single White Female. ABALT: All Borderlines Are Like That.
Borderlines are a profound testament to the common substrate of the female species.
(There are male borderlines too, but NAMALT).
Huh let me know if you can describe it I like trying to figure out which disorders women have
Dating rules for beginners exist because inexperience leads to over-investment, which reads as neediness and kills attraction. The rules are a crutch, not the destination.
The real variable is outcome independence. Someone with genuine options doesn't cling to any single one, and that indifference is itself attractive. You can break every "rule" and still succeed if you genuinely don't care about the result.
When someone senses you're heavily attached to the outcome, they gain leverage. When you're not, they don't. The example of the woman running hot-and-cold on a guy works precisely because she read his scarcity correctly - he had value (SMV), but not options (scarcity), so she knew he'd chase.
The goal isn't to master the tactics. It's to build a life with enough options that no single outcome matters much. At that point, the tactics take care of themselves.
As @Vermillion-Rx and @Koli responses elude to
Read More