#devnews #trpnews #hashtag #news

AS OF NOW, ADS HAVE BEEN OFFICIALLY REMOVED FROM BOTH TRP.RED AND FORUMS.RED

Thanks to the hard work by @Vermillion-Rx and the donations from him and many others, we've reached out fund raising goal to the point where we no longer need ads.

So now everybody has an ad-free experience.

The weird finger/dick with gel at the end will be sorely missed.

Come join the one and only official Red Pill community for X (aka Twitter) that has just launched:

twitter.com/i/communities/1884709882701709526

It is owned and operated by us and endorsed by @redpillschool as well. It is a relaxed posting environment compared to the standards of r/TheRedPill (including allowing memes and short-format posts)

X has repeatedly demonstrated that it is a friendly place to post RP content and has account growth opportunities. Join and feel free to post memes/thoughts/short-form questions there.

Brand new, so feel free to add to the feed.

~VRX

@adam-l When looking into your crystal ball and predicting Trump's demise, why didn't you see Harris losing to Trump and the Dems losing the House and Senate? How about giving him a chance, since the majority of voters voted for him? Do you think cutting waste is a bad idea? Tell me the last time anyone ever tried that? He got rid of DEI. We are back to 2 genders and only men can compete against men, not women in sports. I tell you Trump is just crazy.

@Stigma vaccines were here long before Big Pharma, and independently of any government

@adam-l It’s not a general discussion about vaccines, it’s trying to figure out how you’re occupying both positions.

@Stigma

I don't want to go into the general discussion about vaccines

@adam-l There has to be dissonance, dude. How can you be skeptical of authority, in this case Big Pharma, and also believe you should make vaccines compulsory.

If you make vaccines compulsory, you remove the ability to be skeptical of the authority, and without that skepticism you lose the ability to discern what it is you should be skeptical of.

That would hold true for any example in which "compulsory" or "mandatory" is put before "skepticism" of whatever example we might choose to express the scenario.

I received neither the vaccine nor the virus, why should I then have been made to be vaccinated while I was skeptical of the vaccine?

@Typo-MAGAshiv

Ok so I see two problems with Trump.

The first, that he's pursuing policies that won't work. The Trump camp was kind against neoliberalism, but now it's clear that he's pursuing an ultra-neoliberal agenda.

The second, more general problem, is the tendency towards a "revolution by representative". Even if Trumpism was positive, when people place their hopes on "the leader" instead of common action, it doesn't work.

And I'm not even touching on the big thing Mento is underlining, his leading with emotion.

@Stigma there's no dissonance. At the time the vaccine was out, you just had to choose between getting the virus and getting the vaccine.

(I don't want to go into the general discussion about vaccines, people have chosen sides by now).

@adam-l How do you solve for the dissonance between skepticism of authority and mandating all vaccinations?