Welcome to The Hub. This is our welcoming tribe dedicated to introducing yourself, meeting new people, and learning about new tribes.
12m ago The Hub
@Typo-MAGAshiv in many places. Including implied by Andrew Wilson... and some other tradcons.
13m ago The Hub
web searches and similar** technologies .
I really need an edit button
13m ago The Hub
@Typo-MAGAshiv Crawling?
Since you are the mod, I am gonna pretend your question is genuine.
Its when an automatic software calles up your website.
When you launch a browser, and call the web address in the address bar, it sends a request via the intertubes to the web server that is running the site. The server replies with the HTML, javascript, text, buttons, styles, interactivity, etc.
The browser displays it as a human readable and clickable format.
The crawler is pretty much like the browser. It may look at the links shared at facebook or generate random web addresses until one works (and rinse and repeat), and call the address. But instead of displaying it like a browser does, it will analyze the HTML and look for certain (standardized) locations in the HTML for keywords, to store the address and the associated keywords (and some images and a summary and some other standardized stuff) in a database.
The crawler does all the things automatically.
This is the technology web searches and technologies are built upon.
Read MoreTagging @redpillschool to make sure he sees that
the alpha is a good provider/protector ... [emphasis added]
Where did you come across that? Provision is beta.
@sean_karaya I don't know what it means in that context either
23m ago The Hub
And none of these guys is anywhere near what we would call "alpha".
And therein lies the issue
RP /tradcon spheres tend to assign heroism to everything that attracts women. No matter what it is, if a woman likes it, it must be something.
Some evolutionary psychologists claim, that the alpha is a good provider/protector .... and that's why women want to make children with him.
I don't think that needs to hold. Here, the implicit assumption is, that the man who can protect/provide needs to be the same man the woman is going to make babies with. Or, even more abstractly, women are looking for the best outcome for their babies.
This does not need to hold. Women can just be in a state of "locked mechanism" to look for some trait that at some point in some way was beneficial and never evolved out of it. Being an autistic ornithology enthusiast, I came across studies, that proved that female bird may blindly go after longer and longer tails in male birds of some species, which after a certain narrow slice of time is actually a detriment.
Nature has no reason to assign any benefit to correspond to female choices. It can quite literally be any shxt. If it works, because other males subsidize the choice and the outcomes, that is a perfectly valid evolutionary strategy. Most men, who derive value from being selected by women can't accept this part.
Back to the so called non-alpha man: if he can dump the protection/provision duty to another meathead who is in a trapped region (can't think of a better term) wherein the later is thinking that by being a chest thumping woman-understanding female-wish-conforming individual he is embodying some sort of virtue - the former is clearly a winner. In fact, in that scenario both the former male and the female are spending the least amount of energy to find their mate, and to raise the offspring, letting them focus of creating more offsprings. In the current environment, such r-strategies may be more rewarding.
Now, the exact - for the lack of a better word - algorithm to facilitate such dumping does not matter
So I, for one thing, do not find the case you are speaking of to be anything out of expected to the least.
There is no reason to seek virtue or virtuous justification in women's choices. It is perfectly understandable and model-able and predictable, if we start by assuming that such choices of women are random, or may be even attracted to opportunistic traits or indicators of such traits.
Then by applying the constraint of minimal energy to both the male and the female we will arrive at the conclusion, that the males who are just opportunistic enough - namely the drug dealers, racists, and philanderers - will be perfectly able to attract women more than a diligent brain surgeon.
Incidentally, this will also coincide with women's claim of they love such men for their "personalities". Indeed. For their opportunistic personality.
Read More53m ago The Hub
i offer myself as volunteer if small php / javascript / ruby/ python modification is needed.
57m ago The Hub
@Ill_Will7 is this a genuine question or a rhetorical one?Sry am autistic, dont get sarcasm, much less american ones.