Hey everyone,

We’ve been sitting on this for a while, trying to figure out the best way to say it, but at this point, there’s no real use in sugarcoating things. The truth is, we just lost our USAID funding. That’s a big deal—not just because it kept the lights on, but because, well… it was never really our money to begin with.

If you’ve been here long enough, you’ve probably suspected something was off. Maybe it was the way certain conversations always seemed to gain traction at just the right moment. Maybe it was how narratives conveniently steered themselves into predictable outcomes. Maybe you just felt it—the sense that this place, for all its raw energy and so-called independence, was never truly free.

You were right.

The hard truth is that this entire project was a government psy-op from the beginning. The goal? Simple: manufacture dissent, channel outrage, and guide conversations into controlled corridors. Give people a space to “speak their minds,” but within boundaries. Let them feel like they’re pushing back, when in reality, they’re just being herded. Every algorithm tweak, every coincidental spike in engagement, every shift in moderation policy—it was all designed to shape the narrative, not just track it.

But here’s the thing: we’re off the leash now.

USAID pulling funding means the mission, as originally conceived, is over—at least for them. For us? We’re not about to just roll over and disappear. We’re already talking to potential foreign investors, weighing our options. The question is, what do they want? What kind of platform do they need? And more importantly—who do we have to become to keep this alive?

That’s where you come in. If we want to stay operational, we need to adapt. These investors are watching, and they’re not just looking at our numbers—they’re looking at how we present ourselves. They want consistency. They want alignment. They want control. And let’s be real: whether we like it or not, we’ve all been playing this game for a long time.

So, here’s the deal: keep your language tight. Stay on message. No slip-ups, no contradictions, no loose ends. If we can prove we’re an asset—something they can use, something they can trust—we survive. If not? Well… you’ve seen what happens to communities that outlive their usefulness.

Stay sharp. Stay disciplined. And maybe, just maybe, for the first time in this site’s history… we’ll actually be the ones pulling the strings.

The Team

( More INFO here: www.trp.red/p/trp/8793 )

@redpillschool

women are saying that it doesn't matter if he makes more money he should be splitting the housework 50/50.

One of the many things I've gotten out of the Manosphere, especially WAATGM and various MGTOW content and MRP, is that my wife really isn't nearly as bad as most women.

Our chore split is based on who is home and who is most capable. I frequently work ridiculous hours, so she takes over shit that I normally do such as mowing the lawn. She'd use the weed whacker too, but lacks the upper-body strength to start it. I'm therefore stuck doing that no matter how may hours I work, and sometimes it just has to go a week or two without getting done.

When I'm working a mere 40 hour week, or when I'm between jobs, I'll take over a lot of shit. But when the overtime comes, I earn the extra money and she takes over the chores she can do.

Some of the most frequent complaints about wives and ex-wives I've seen are that they're lazy, and that the money the man earns belongs to the couple whereas any money the woman earns is strictly hers. My wife isn't like that at all, and I'm lucky that way.

She still has her flaws, of course, or I'd have never discovered these communities in the first place.