Discussion about the 5th gen war
Because, reference my previous posts. In order:
- Generate anti-Muslim sentiment. (for an Anti-Muslim, that's perfect!).
- Generate sectarian tensions.
- Roll out anti-terrorist security measures (i.e. more totalitarianism, police state)
- Turn Europe into a battle ground.
It is the same fascist playbook playing out. Why do you keep falling for this?
It's either you are genuinely stupid or you are part of the plan.
I don't like to play the victim game, but I remember the terrorist shootings that targeted Muslims:
-
2019: Christchurch, New Zealand - 51 dead, 40 injured, in 2 Mosques during Friday prayers.
-
2017: Quebec, Canada: 6 dead, 19 injured, in a Mosque, during Evening Prayer (I remember this one, I was at Canada during that time)
- 2011: Utoya Island, Norway. 69 dead, 300 injured (not just Muslims, this guy was against everybody).
Countless others. Let's also exclude the wars and millions who have been killed by white imperialism (that created the refugee crisis in the first place). Oh thought I would forget that one.
But let's zoom in on the 3rd one. What did Anders Breivik say:
"Breivik described his actions as a protest against multiculturalism and what he called "Islamic colonization" of Europe. His ideology targeted immigration policies and the political parties that supported them."
Are you about to go on a shooting spree? You seem like a far right psychopath to me. And an useful idiot at this point.
Did you notice that Muslims don't seem to whine and complain, but also are able to distance the perpetrators from the broader mass of people. Something that lesser minds (like yours) are unable to do.
In any case, your inability to zoom out is concerning to me. Guys like you should be monitored.
Read More@Lionsmane8 Reminder though, you didn't even attempt to solve your cognitive dissonance by
He is a radical anti-Muslim.
Why do you think he attacked a traditional German Christmas market, and not a gathering of Muslims?
1
1
Dude, you're stretching it. What you did is the equivalent of a backwards side split, and with no evidence to back it up.
I'm just amused at your rationalizations. lolz
It seems you fit the perfect profile for psy-ops. It just works on you! buahaha
In any case, we do agree on something: "he is a patsy. For the German neoliberal agenda". but with a correction: he is a patsy for the EU and Global neo-liberal agenda.
Additional corrections:
he was a de-radicalised muslim that appeared on the bbc.
-
He is a radical anti-Muslim.
- Luigi Mangione is an upper-class Ivy League kid.
You'll have to learn to read things from a global as well as a class perspective. It requires some mental effort, but I know you can do it!!!!
@FakeFightingFuzzy Very good. Works on multiple levels, even. It applies to Russians here because their war is sanctioned and active, the gesture of dissent means nothing.
The gesture of dissent in my context however applies to a widening discontent with the status quo. It is not the g.o.d that will change the situation, but it will evoke change in the hearts and minds - again, it works on multiple levels. Clever slav humour.
@deeplydisturbed one thing that always bothers me... its on yt. The best I can offer to explain it is: to avoid B Streisand effect.
@Lionsmane8 Here's something else you and @deeplydisturbed seem to not have a grasp on.
Using Luigi Mangione as a good example. Let's say there is a goal, and that goal is to assassinate the CEO of a healthcare company because he is due to testify against you better interests. You need him gone, but you need it done cleanly. So what do you do? You look for a patsy, you might even make your own. That is Luigi Mangione. A man who had an agenda of his own against the healthcare system in the U.S. He had plausible reason to murder the CEO and a whipped up manifesto to say as much. So they spend some time either radicalising the bloke or just crafting the narrative. Then when it's all in place they pull the trigger. Boom, the CEO is dead and they frame Luigi Mangione for the murder.
Taleb Al Abdulmohsen is one of them. His story is perfectly crafted, his history is perfectly aligned. Axel Rudakubana, another such story. His family history, his fathers deportation halted on human rights grounds. Literally "hang on, don't deport him, we may have a use for him later."
If it was anything else but what happened - then how do you answer: Why do you think he attacked a traditional German Christmas market, and not a gathering of Muslims?
You cannot square that circle without engaging in cognitive dissonance over the fact that he is a patsy. For the German neoliberal agenda, he is a patsy against the rise of an anti-neoliberal party.
Useful idiots will then copy and paste his X feed, repeat the headlines of the neoliberals that "a car drove into people", but actually it was a radical right wing apologist, but he was a de-radicalised muslim that appeared on the bbc, but he was, but he was...
If I can predict your replies, you're in the framework of an ideology.
Read More
2
1