Welcome to The Hub. This is our welcoming tribe dedicated to introducing yourself, meeting new people, and learning about new tribes.
@Rexx that's still essentially a gold digger prostituting herself. No one in this thread has said that money won't get you laid; @Lone_Ranger and I are simply saying that money doesn't arouse them.
saying that flaunting wealth leads to giney tingles is highly inaccurate
Where did i say flaunting it?
In your reply upthread, linked here, which I now quote (and fisk):
Money helps you get laid IF money gives you access and freedom to do things with her that give her tingles.
Again, money is provisioning, which is beta/comfort. Women like it, but it does not arouse them.
Kind of like how we like it when a woman can cook; it's great, but her cooking doesn't give me a boner.
You got a yatch? Invite her on it with wine = tingles.
Inviting someone to your yacht is about as "flaunting it" as one can get.
Got a swanky penthouse overlooking a major landmark? = Invite her over and she'll probably put out more easily than some other location with the same man.
This is just a logistics thing. In my experience, if you aroused them enough, they'd help figure out the logistics. I've had women take me back to their place and we'd fuck while their roommate or even children were in the next room. And I was broke.
Own a ski condo with your own gear? = Tingles trip without spending any money on her specifically
No tingles. Just enjoying the free shit you're providing. And this is majorly flaunting wealth/assets. Far more likely to trigger gold-digging instincts than any arousal.
Again, money does not fucking arouse them.
Read MoreThe bar for reaching red pill acceptance in 2025 is so much greater than what you needed to hit acceptance 10 years ago.
Really? It looks to me as though more young men are unplugging, compared to 10 years ago
I just some stupid e-whore attention whoring on a random image for the 17365272525th time but it hit different this time
It really sunk in how much absurd power women have just because dudes wanna stick their peen in something
Fucking wild how much more insane and ridiculous this shit has gotten since social media and e-whoring became an option for these hoes. Men are enabling this shit for whores on the other end of a screen
The bar for reaching red pill acceptance in 2025 is so much greater than what you needed to hit acceptance 10 years ago.
1
2
I don't think we have any disagreement. Money has a role in getting laid, but it's a shitty outcome if that's all you have to offer.
I think the crux of our disagreement lies herein,
"You still have to make use of it in a way that wets panties."
I am of the opinion that money simply does not wet panties. It just doesn't.
I've had money, and I've spent a long time around money, to see that money simply does not wet panties. If anything, it is negatively correlated to the dampness of the panties.
You might find that some gold diggers are prepared to strategically open their legs, but what you will find when they do, is not wet panties. They will be bone dry.
Money does not the undergarments moisten. It simply does not.
think of Mark Zuck or Elon. They can get laid. But I bet they can't dampen the panties. Whatever pussy they are getting, they are paying for it one way or another. your example of the ski lodge and the yacht are perfect examples - you would be 'paying' for it, even though no banknotes have been exchanged. the main problem with paying for sex is that there is the absence of the golden ingredient - which is desire.
Money does not dampen the panties. not if you give her $100 and not if you let her stay on your yacht.
Why do I suspect that money actually drys the panties? Because money can convey suitability. it shows that you are reliable, hardworking and mature. And that kills tingles.
The thing that moistens the panties is unsuitability. The guy that cleans the pool is far more likely to damped the panties of Ms Zuckerberg than Mark. Esp if he is unsuitable, vain, child like, egotistical, unreliable etc.
Read More
1
3
The Dylan movie has a great depiction of the unchainable Alpha archetype, together with a graphic little scece of a plate breaking.
Well worth the watch.
Where did i say flaunting it?
Perhaps my point was poorly articulated. Wealth gives you freedom of activity choice and different sceneries of intensity.
You still have to make use of it in a way that wets panties.
I used extreme examples and did not communicate my point in a way it was intended.
Gold diggers will prostitute themselves, but they won't be aroused
I openly made a point to that effect at the end of my statement. I'm not sure if it was glossed over. I was answering what role does money have in seduction, and there is very little role it has, but can somewhat
2
2
