Welcome to The Hub. This is our welcoming tribe dedicated to introducing yourself, meeting new people, and learning about new tribes.
#devnews #trpnews #hashtag #news
AS OF NOW, ADS HAVE BEEN OFFICIALLY REMOVED FROM BOTH TRP.RED AND FORUMS.RED
Thanks to the hard work by @Vermillion-Rx and the donations from him and many others, we've reached out fund raising goal to the point where we no longer need ads.
So now everybody has an ad-free experience.
The weird finger/dick with gel at the end will be sorely missed.
Come join the one and only official Red Pill community for X (aka Twitter) that has just launched:
twitter.com/i/communities/1884709882701709526
It is owned and operated by us and endorsed by @redpillschool as well. It is a relaxed posting environment compared to the standards of r/TheRedPill (including allowing memes and short-format posts)
X has repeatedly demonstrated that it is a friendly place to post RP content and has account growth opportunities. Join and feel free to post memes/thoughts/short-form questions there.
Brand new, so feel free to add to the feed.
~VRX
2h ago The Hub
@Stigma I believe all over less. www.vox.com/2015/6/23/8832311/war-casualties-600-years
600 years however don't really come close to the picture over time. The end of the stone age and the bronze ages were very bloody.
From wikipedia "Bioarchaeologists have found from the skeletal remains of more than 2,300 early farmers from 180 sites in northwestern Europe between 8,000 and 4,000 years ago that more than one in ten suffered weapon injuries." That shows endemic tribal warfare over millennia. At the collapse points it was much worse.
The fact that war does not kill very high population percentages these days does not mean that it won't kill more in future. It has the potential with powerful weapons and lots of people to be killed.
War kills far fewer in percentage of the people these days than it once did.
Participants (soldiers)? or civilian populations too?
2h ago The Hub
@adam-l I am not so worried about psychopaths. They exist and are more common in positions of power. I don't like them but they are a feature of humanity as it is. One can benefit from the world without being a psychopath.
War kills far fewer in percentage of the people these days than it once did. It peaked in the late neolithic early bronze age.
See, I believe there is only one resource: pussy. Men are willing to trade in diamonds, houses, yachts, even work, i.e. their valuable life time, in order to get it. And the price of that commodity is kept artificially inflated.
The only ones that truly "benefit" from the world as it is are, actually, psychopaths. They absolutely need to keep everyone else at a state of constant vigilance, otherwise their own internal state threatens to consume them.
This fact works in tandem with the fact that human didn't really evolve to live in societies of millions. These societies have turned out to be the natural habitat of psychopaths.
5h ago The Hub
@adam-l I agree that the resources are not for the common soldier and have not been for a long time -300 years or more in the west. The officer class did well till the start of last century. Now soldier is a job that people do, not a way of life and most people hope to avoid opportunity for courage.
I think we need to remember that these are strange times. As resources get scarcer, the value in war will increase. The common soldier may never get rich but his masters will as in the end a man who can bring victory will be prized above all.
She had dreams of becoming a nurse
Step 1: Let him hit it raw.
...
"...So wrap your tool, don't be a fool. Latex. Saves. Pay checks."
— Terrence Popp, *Source
#2024 #Quotes #TerrencePopp #Writer #Military #Army #Retired #Veteran #SNCO #Redonkulas #World #US #America #Dating #Relationships #Marriage #Divorce #Sex #Fornication