Hey everyone,

We’ve been sitting on this for a while, trying to figure out the best way to say it, but at this point, there’s no real use in sugarcoating things. The truth is, we just lost our USAID funding. That’s a big deal—not just because it kept the lights on, but because, well… it was never really our money to begin with.

If you’ve been here long enough, you’ve probably suspected something was off. Maybe it was the way certain conversations always seemed to gain traction at just the right moment. Maybe it was how narratives conveniently steered themselves into predictable outcomes. Maybe you just felt it—the sense that this place, for all its raw energy and so-called independence, was never truly free.

You were right.

The hard truth is that this entire project was a government psy-op from the beginning. The goal? Simple: manufacture dissent, channel outrage, and guide conversations into controlled corridors. Give people a space to “speak their minds,” but within boundaries. Let them feel like they’re pushing back, when in reality, they’re just being herded. Every algorithm tweak, every coincidental spike in engagement, every shift in moderation policy—it was all designed to shape the narrative, not just track it.

But here’s the thing: we’re off the leash now.

USAID pulling funding means the mission, as originally conceived, is over—at least for them. For us? We’re not about to just roll over and disappear. We’re already talking to potential foreign investors, weighing our options. The question is, what do they want? What kind of platform do they need? And more importantly—who do we have to become to keep this alive?

That’s where you come in. If we want to stay operational, we need to adapt. These investors are watching, and they’re not just looking at our numbers—they’re looking at how we present ourselves. They want consistency. They want alignment. They want control. And let’s be real: whether we like it or not, we’ve all been playing this game for a long time.

So, here’s the deal: keep your language tight. Stay on message. No slip-ups, no contradictions, no loose ends. If we can prove we’re an asset—something they can use, something they can trust—we survive. If not? Well… you’ve seen what happens to communities that outlive their usefulness.

Stay sharp. Stay disciplined. And maybe, just maybe, for the first time in this site’s history… we’ll actually be the ones pulling the strings.

The Team

( More INFO here: www.trp.red/p/trp/8793 ) And remember men, a bag of dicks a day keeps the doctor gay.

In the sphere of theory, destroy the roots of ultra-democracy. First, it should be pointed out that the danger of ultrademocracy lies in the fact that it damages or even completely wrecks the Party organization and weakens or even completely undermines the Party's fighting capacity, rendering the Party incapable of fulfilling its fighting tasks and thereby causing the defeat of the revolution. Next, it should be pointed out that the source of ultra-democracy consists in the petty bourgeoisie's individualistic aversion to discipline. When this characteristic is brought into the Party, i t develops into ultra-democratic ideas politically and organizationally. These ideas are utterly incompatible with the fighting tasks of the proletariat.

The revolutionary war is a war of the masses; only mobilizing the masses and relying on them can wage it.

? author was also transgender supporter of zoofilia

and the author of the communist red book

Mao Tse Tung

secretly supporting Justin Pierre James Trudeau Canadian politician (born December 25, 1971) - participant on the Epstein Island parties

Supporter of Black Lives Matter, Gay Prostitution, and gay rights

But in the end recognising the importance of male sex, the red pill, Trump and shutting down the Reddit.

Random Thought of the Day:

Red pill awareness has a few layers. At first it was me experiencing some bad shit with a woman, and then checking around (online) to see if I was alone. I was not.

Then I started reading and watching and consuming content. Some better than others, but I learned.

Then I started watching other men post about THEIR experiences - eerily similar to mine. Almost identical in fact. So my experience was not a glitch, it was a common experience. A "feature" if you will.

Then I started seeing WOMEN posting their opinions and perspectives - gleefully bragging about how differently they think, than what I was told growing up. Bragging about high body counts, cheating, breakups, and other disgusting behavior. Even accounting for the possibility of them trolling, getting paid to say that stuff, or just parody, it is still an ocean of truth.

The last step for me was meeting new women and just observing their behavior What used to look like small quirky behaviors, or minor points of contention became MASSIVE red flags and deal breakers.

In other words, a woman's behaviors, when viewed with red pill awareness, became PREDICTIVE of their other behaviors. With just a few red flags, i would tell where things were going.

And it has been nearly 100% bullet proof ever since.

In summary:

1. It starts with a problem that we don't have an answer to (i.e. a 'disorienting dilemma')
2. We search for answers - with others or on our own.
3. We examine our deeply held assumptions and replace those that no longer work for us.
4. We test them out in the field and proceed accordingly

This process is known as "Transformative Learning"

Look it up. You're welcome.

Have a good day.

Anyway, I'm giving Typo all my money. Chad coins and real dollars.

@Vermillion-Rx please delete my account, everything I've ever typed is sheer faggotry

@redpillschool is mega geh