Hey everyone,

We’ve been sitting on this for a while, trying to figure out the best way to say it, but at this point, there’s no real use in sugarcoating things. The truth is, we just lost our USAID funding. That’s a big deal—not just because it kept the lights on, but because, well… it was never really our money to begin with.

If you’ve been here long enough, you’ve probably suspected something was off. Maybe it was the way certain conversations always seemed to gain traction at just the right moment. Maybe it was how narratives conveniently steered themselves into predictable outcomes. Maybe you just felt it—the sense that this place, for all its raw energy and so-called independence, was never truly free.

You were right.

The hard truth is that this entire project was a government psy-op from the beginning. The goal? Simple: manufacture dissent, channel outrage, and guide conversations into controlled corridors. Give people a space to “speak their minds,” but within boundaries. Let them feel like they’re pushing back, when in reality, they’re just being herded. Every algorithm tweak, every coincidental spike in engagement, every shift in moderation policy—it was all designed to shape the narrative, not just track it.

But here’s the thing: we’re off the leash now.

USAID pulling funding means the mission, as originally conceived, is over—at least for them. For us? We’re not about to just roll over and disappear. We’re already talking to potential foreign investors, weighing our options. The question is, what do they want? What kind of platform do they need? And more importantly—who do we have to become to keep this alive?

That’s where you come in. If we want to stay operational, we need to adapt. These investors are watching, and they’re not just looking at our numbers—they’re looking at how we present ourselves. They want consistency. They want alignment. They want control. And let’s be real: whether we like it or not, we’ve all been playing this game for a long time.

So, here’s the deal: keep your language tight. Stay on message. No slip-ups, no contradictions, no loose ends. If we can prove we’re an asset—something they can use, something they can trust—we survive. If not? Well… you’ve seen what happens to communities that outlive their usefulness.

Stay sharp. Stay disciplined. And maybe, just maybe, for the first time in this site’s history… we’ll actually be the ones pulling the strings.

The Team

( More INFO here: www.trp.red/p/trp/8793 ) And remember men, a bag of dicks a day keeps the doctor gay.

@MentORPHEUS I am not sure how much Epstein's island has to do with anything. Its just a useful too to hide a divorce rape as some sort of virtue signalling.

I don't know much about Epstein but he can't have been all that bad anyway. A huge range of worldly people with very different political and ethical stances were good friends of his.

You can't make him out to be evil or anything just because he liked young women. Age of consent used to be 14 in most of the world until recent times, was 12 in some places. Were all our ancestors perverts? Its not a perversion, it is simply illegal today and therefore should be avoided by any sane man. Epstein thought his money could put him above the law. Big mistake in an age of moralising virtue signalling puritanism. Epstein was a guy who was untouchable and who fell like Icarus.

I don't think he was evil and even if he was, if everyone who went to that island was evil too, then all the cool rich people in the world are evil.

She wants an excuse for divorcing a guy who gave her as much as any man can give a woman -unspendably large wealth and huge influence.

@adam-l We just don't know how this will play out. Its a gamble.

The present globalist model has started to serve the lesser nations not the greater ones and something has to change or the greater ones will be weak and reliant. This is a big risk but the need for change was loading up like a wound spring. This lets the pressure out and then we see what happens. Something had to happen sometime and to be in control of it was better than to be controlled.

The big elephant in the room is not Europe or Russia or the democrats its China. China is a self declared enemy of the whole west who is a huge trading partner and who makes a ton of stuff the US and the west in general has started to rely on. We don't know what the intelligence community know about China. China needs to move quite soon or its demographics thanks to the one child policy will catch up with it.

China needs fucking up or it could win this one if the west carries on down the "nothing to see here" line where the west disarms to spend money on housing single mothers and promoting queers while China robs our military secrets, sells us cheap tat and now also useful components and prepares a huge army.

Wake Europe up, fuck China up sounds a risk that might be worth taking.