Hey everyone,

We’ve been sitting on this for a while, trying to figure out the best way to say it, but at this point, there’s no real use in sugarcoating things. The truth is, we just lost our USAID funding. That’s a big deal—not just because it kept the lights on, but because, well… it was never really our money to begin with.

If you’ve been here long enough, you’ve probably suspected something was off. Maybe it was the way certain conversations always seemed to gain traction at just the right moment. Maybe it was how narratives conveniently steered themselves into predictable outcomes. Maybe you just felt it—the sense that this place, for all its raw energy and so-called independence, was never truly free.

You were right.

The hard truth is that this entire project was a government psy-op from the beginning. The goal? Simple: manufacture dissent, channel outrage, and guide conversations into controlled corridors. Give people a space to “speak their minds,” but within boundaries. Let them feel like they’re pushing back, when in reality, they’re just being herded. Every algorithm tweak, every coincidental spike in engagement, every shift in moderation policy—it was all designed to shape the narrative, not just track it.

But here’s the thing: we’re off the leash now.

USAID pulling funding means the mission, as originally conceived, is over—at least for them. For us? We’re not about to just roll over and disappear. We’re already talking to potential foreign investors, weighing our options. The question is, what do they want? What kind of platform do they need? And more importantly—who do we have to become to keep this alive?

That’s where you come in. If we want to stay operational, we need to adapt. These investors are watching, and they’re not just looking at our numbers—they’re looking at how we present ourselves. They want consistency. They want alignment. They want control. And let’s be real: whether we like it or not, we’ve all been playing this game for a long time.

So, here’s the deal: keep your language tight. Stay on message. No slip-ups, no contradictions, no loose ends. If we can prove we’re an asset—something they can use, something they can trust—we survive. If not? Well… you’ve seen what happens to communities that outlive their usefulness.

Stay sharp. Stay disciplined. And maybe, just maybe, for the first time in this site’s history… we’ll actually be the ones pulling the strings.

The Team

( More INFO here: www.trp.red/p/trp/8793 ) And remember men, a bag of dicks a day keeps the doctor gay.

Rant for the day:

For a long time, but more so recently, I have had a "rule" in my head and it is this:

Any woman I might consider dating, no matter how long or briefly I expect it to last, must be absolutely, utterly, and completely on her knees to the relationship. Not necessarily to me, but to what we have together. a relationship is like a baby - yes it takes two people to create one, but it has its onw needs and wants and you BOTH have to take care of it. And I want her (metaphorically) scrubbing the floors of the relationship with a fucking toothbrush, cleaning the toilets, digging out the hair in the drain, and cleaning the grout in the shower. If she can take a dog for a walk, feed it homemade food, take it to the vet, love it, hug it, pet it, and literally pick up dogshit with her own hands - protected only by a ratty plastic shopping bag - then she can care for the hygiene of the relationship. If she is not HUMBLY and thankfully on her fucking knees (after getting to know me) there is no chance for us. If she cannot humble herself to love, then she has an attitude that cannot be fixed. Even an "alpha" cannot fixt this in the long run. Ask around. She has to be completely done with her past life, her mistakes, her exes, and any and all male orbiters - AND she must value what she has before her like her life depends on it. If not, then she is not a fit for the type of relationship I am looking for. TL;DR - attitude and humility are everything.

One can say anything they wish about this. "Women don't think like men do" "You are describing oneitis" "Hypergamy will make her do this to the next man too" "AWALT" - all fair comments. But without this set of conditions, it is just a fling.