Hey everyone,

We’ve been sitting on this for a while, trying to figure out the best way to say it, but at this point, there’s no real use in sugarcoating things. The truth is, we just lost our USAID funding. That’s a big deal—not just because it kept the lights on, but because, well… it was never really our money to begin with.

If you’ve been here long enough, you’ve probably suspected something was off. Maybe it was the way certain conversations always seemed to gain traction at just the right moment. Maybe it was how narratives conveniently steered themselves into predictable outcomes. Maybe you just felt it—the sense that this place, for all its raw energy and so-called independence, was never truly free.

You were right.

The hard truth is that this entire project was a government psy-op from the beginning. The goal? Simple: manufacture dissent, channel outrage, and guide conversations into controlled corridors. Give people a space to “speak their minds,” but within boundaries. Let them feel like they’re pushing back, when in reality, they’re just being herded. Every algorithm tweak, every coincidental spike in engagement, every shift in moderation policy—it was all designed to shape the narrative, not just track it.

But here’s the thing: we’re off the leash now.

USAID pulling funding means the mission, as originally conceived, is over—at least for them. For us? We’re not about to just roll over and disappear. We’re already talking to potential foreign investors, weighing our options. The question is, what do they want? What kind of platform do they need? And more importantly—who do we have to become to keep this alive?

That’s where you come in. If we want to stay operational, we need to adapt. These investors are watching, and they’re not just looking at our numbers—they’re looking at how we present ourselves. They want consistency. They want alignment. They want control. And let’s be real: whether we like it or not, we’ve all been playing this game for a long time.

So, here’s the deal: keep your language tight. Stay on message. No slip-ups, no contradictions, no loose ends. If we can prove we’re an asset—something they can use, something they can trust—we survive. If not? Well… you’ve seen what happens to communities that outlive their usefulness.

Stay sharp. Stay disciplined. And maybe, just maybe, for the first time in this site’s history… we’ll actually be the ones pulling the strings.

The Team

( More INFO here: www.trp.red/p/trp/8793 ) And remember men, a bag of dicks a day keeps the doctor gay.

youtu.be/LLc087tc2vk

This interviews are excellent.

Screenshots of a chick logic/narcs/BPDs/crazies I see here, are nothing in a comparison to this. It is actually authentic [unless they hire an actress].

This one has a title 'A Road Less Traveled-Brielle', story of likely narc. First the half of an interview she tells the stories from her childhood so you can't know are they real or not. IN the second half she gets reality check on raising her son, plans to sustain her income [304] and it is Bullshit TV live.

Her interview would a perfect example of how relationship with a [narc] ho goes.

COmments

Its too bad, she seemed very authentic until Mark asked her how she was sustaining a life in Costa Rica...only then did she say about still escorting. I feel she wasn't going to disclose that and wanted us to believe she was living a pure life with her child. Then i doubted most of her story. Going on Marks channel is big promotion for your own youtube channel.

'd say that manipulative pretty women are the worst, but all the gaslit people in the comments dazzling her up are probably worse... they just encourage and perpetuate this bs... She's a 304. She uses her looks to use others to get by in life. She has a kid that she talks about like a possession and money opportunity (mommy vlogging and sharing "her story" on YouTube) and disregarding the father that she picked for the child. She runs so far away from the problems she creates in her life she goes to another country and then capitalizes on their cheap labor so she doesn't even have to be a mom, when she's "sponsored" with no job still. Stop glorifying this kind of bs just cause the person spewing it is nice to look at and a good storyteller... smh

"I ended up meeting this guy" - Every 2 min of the story

I don’t believe a word she says. I’ve met many people like her. Smooth talking: but it’s the inflection of the voice. It’s that bullshit frequency that hits my ears and I pick up so well.

@adam-l

First, we don't know for sure what Gates did re Epstein.

True. we don't. But I'd bet dollars to doughnuts that his ex-wife has a much better idea of his activities than we do.

Epstein had links to about everyone (even Noam Chomsky and his wife)

It wouldn't surprise me much if it turned out that Chomsky liked kids.

Second, there was another guy who had ties to Epstein, and you voted him for president ffs.

Trump and Epstein both had ties to the Clintons in the 1990s.

Being rich and influential means you'll at least meet other rich and influential people occasionally.

what's with the cognitive dissonance?

There isn't any.

The basic premise is that she divorced him because he fucked other pussy.

No.

She got past his other indiscretions.

Being involved in pederasty was too much.

[the other shit about Melinda]

I don't think anyone here is holding her up as some kind of moral beacon or whatever.

For my part, all I'm saying is that I understand why she divorced his ass. That doesn't mean that she's in any way worthy of admiration of any sort