I don't have PUA background but I see more of difference from 6 to 7 or 8 to 9 than 7 to 8.
7 ans 8 are the attractive side of normal and the normal side of attractive.
I spent most of my life hovering around 6.5 and had plenty of IoIs just by basically sitting there "looking mysterious."
Man, my favorite is still PON take that the scale should be 1-30.
His main argument was a majority of men tend to over-rate women Plus it allows for more variety and some over lap.
A 7 doesn't necessarily become a 21 because his categories were untouchable 1-9, normal women 11-19, and super model/celebrity hot. That 7 would likely be a 16-18 when you look at the entire scope of women.
My biggest life experience that really opened my eyes to this concept was moving from a college town of 120k to LA.
The 8s around here would barely pass as 6s out there. Even in Portland and Seattle vs a Midwest university town with fresh batches of 18yos ever August, there was just that many more, physically more attractive women.
At the end of the day any scale is just an arbitrary tool for guy talk. All that really matters is do you find her attractive enough or not: binary.
Read MoreI was trying to come up with an accurate estimate for how many women would qualify and it's gotta be less than 15%.
I know plenty of ugly girls with enjoyable personalities.
I know plenty of hot women with terrible personality traits.
I really don't know, too many, above average looking broads with a personality that is tolerable for long periods of time.
@Kloi I felt as though I was at the gas station filling up my tank.

