@MidgetSpinner

Download tinder on either a burner or settings for "only show me to profiles I've swiped on" (so you don't like a faggot), make your looking for "men", and then browse top picks.

That is the easiest way to see what the best male profiles look like. Some of them aren't even Chads, they just have incredibly photogenic pics of them having a great lifestyle and bio that is a cherry on top. But top picks is where your mystical profiles are.

It's worth doing for research purposes

@Lone_Ranger It is. Easily. I only have to walk into a bar and I've got female attention. I just think OLD used to actually be a useful tool, but now it fucking sucks donkey shit.

@Vermillion-Rx What I wanna know is where are all these mystical top 5 percenters? I wanna see what their profiles look like, and see how it compares to the average.

@MidgetSpinner

but that women aren't necessarily looking for ONS on them.

It's not that they are looking for ONS, it is that the sexual marketplace in OLD just leads to it.

You have 80% or more of women (it's probably like 95%) swiping on the best profiles. They'll stop on some lesser ones just because but they are swiping in the best ones because more times often than not those profiles still swipe them back. Then 90% of men are getting almost no matches or very few.

So almost all women on OLD are gauranteed sex and dates, a small tier of B men even smaller group of A and S-tier OLD chads have all the women. Because they have woman-like levels of choice, they could just run harems and they often do, making most women short term flings by consequence

@Vermillion-Rx I agree with @coolsocks00. Yeah, it's cool that she's tricking out on a mountain bike (My ex girlfriend was sick on a BMX too), but I want to see how fit your body is, how pretty your face is primarily. I'm not trying to penetrate your hobby.

To juxtapose that, I do however have chad-level pics of me playing drums, some shirtless, in motion as well. Others of me smiling walking down the street and lookin swagged. I've had compliments on all of these photos from women at one time or another, but apparently they no longer work on dating sites haha. I'm really inclined to agree with you though as well Vermillion on that pictures make up 95% of the appeal, but that women aren't necessarily looking for ONS on them.

@MidgetSpinner

Second Chad quality photo she had on her profile because I can't upload two photos at once (I should just image combine them)

@MidgetSpinner

I guess I could contribute a lot of my recent OLD site failures to shitty pictures

OLD is literally 95% photos

Every time I've ever seen a guy shit on OLD for it "not working" and i review his profile, his pics are cringey low quality awkward shit. EVERY. SINGLE. TIME.

since I'm not on OLD sites to look for a fucking relationship.

That's your first mistake. Girls get on old cause they suck at real life and end up getting hookups instead

Your OLD doesn't need shirtless photos. Here is a photo a girl used on her profile but this is a prime example of quality photos chads have and why they are succeeding

@MidgetSpinner

I always tell guys the story of how i fucked a girl relentlessly a year after i unmatched her from Hinge. She wouldn't even respond to my messages and i didn't recognize her in person nor did she recognize me a year later when we crossed paths.

In person she wanted the fuck out of me and I drilled her relentlessly for 2 months in multiple holes multiple days a week. She was always horny af for me

On OLD i was an inconsequential loser to her and in person she asked for MY number and badly wanted me.

I think the longer girls stay on old the pickier they get. When hinge etc was newer in popularity girls gave more chances but when you have 10 billion likes you only go out with top 5% plus