@NaCl If I understand you correctly, a guy is physically AMOGging you playfully and persistently. A few Aikido-like moves that effortlessly take the "opponent's" balance and place him in an undignified heap on the floor without violence would motivate such a person to stop targeting you for his games.
Once social dancing was in presence of chaperon so it was pretty good event to initiate physical contact, talk etc. without right out whoring around.
Now it is mostly fuck fest for the top X%.
I can see that many - regularly coming - girls are soulless , some are just usual cunts and some mix.
Now I'm well past beginner level and I still enjoy fresh inexp meat the most - although they can dance terrible. Not only because they are usually younger, but also tend to have more fun - although poor skills, where empty souls have also attached their ego to routines and are afraid to step out of comfort.
The other day some dude organized open air party in the noon. Many regular dudes turned up and I was the worst dancer from the bunch. But being in new environment I have noticed one more thing. I was the only dude to go outside of the 'ring' and pull random chicks in. Which I consider now better strategy then going after regular or semi-regular girls.
Read MoreI got to know new dude and he likes to put an elbow onto me an hang on like that. I don't have strong feeling about it but what got me thinking is the persistence of this behaviour once I shook him off.
Any thoughts?
I don't think you or a lot of other women really understand the effect blue-balling a man has.
I would disagree on specifically this. This effect is important on men with experience. They know [expect] it is some kind of game and blue balling leads to breaking it off. Guys with none to average exp with added specific mindset variable [still believing woman might not lie] might go along. But here comes a known patter of choosing a partner by woman [6 6 6 etc]. OP doesn't probably realise that she'll have to make compromises somewhere, They might be not obvious at the beginning. Maybe the guy doesn;t fuck, maybe weak frame... And what she'll do about it later.
The virgin point is really all you have going for you with this strategy.
I you would do a poll amongst men do they believe 'virgin' card, I don't believe any man with experience would ever assign any value to these words. Maybe not dismiss it, but not believe it at all. Blue naïve boys would but is it someone OP will have? Will it survive if they guy is blue and naïve.
I know, I wouldn't give a shit. I have seen enough lies. Even when being blue I never cared that much about words and was inspecting behaviour.
In my books 'vigin' has very limited value, it might temporarily raise some feel good hormone level, but then: meh. I wouldn't probably believe 16yo saying that these days, at 23yo as someone else brought it up, man will think: 'OK I wonder how many blowjobs there was'.
All in all - I IMAGINE - to benefit on virgin card but blue balling a man is to be low key, slave. Showing absolut fucking commitment to case and man. If sex is not on a table then what is? Does OP wants piece of mans time for negative value she brings [time taken and after break up nothing to show for it]?
There is also a test for a man in it. If he gets a slave like this nad will resist to abuse it it is a good sign.
As for a slave commitment. You have feminizm to thank for it.
As for a man doing its thing. Woman can never show anything close to rage or nagging, about it. She can express whatever she wants but only as an outlet to bad feelings so it doesn't overwhelm her.
I think it is quite clear how complicated it gets with every paragraph and it is only beginning.
Again thank feminizm for it.
We're not talking here that by accident everything will just click. Chances of this are like meeting unicorn, during derailed train event.
Read More