@Lone_Ranger thanks for the ESG insight.

I understand that that companies.scoring high on.the scale have higher chances to bury themselves. But is there any advantage to consider for investment companies low on the scale? Or do the high scoring companies.have ways to fake it longterm?

I would like to.state the view (not pro nor con) on jet meetings, that would come up if someone would go indepth: personal meetings are.more valuable than video chats and since they come.all over the world one wouldn't expect them to travel.by trains or ships, nor use video conference, saying that it creates plausible deniability for doing deals that cant really be traced.

In the article I couldnt see anything very bad, for example someone's flight transfer lasting more than it would take to get a car.

Although it is worth to note the event, I would rather say that this news rather creates more white noise, as it can be fairly easlily defended, by plausible deniability (article have nothing outrageous).

There appears to be a trend towards larger aircraft, with expensive heavy jets the aircraft of choice,” Christie said. “This is at least in part due to some of the long distances traveled, but also possibly due to business rivals not wanting to be seen to be outdone by one another.”

Only this. They might be defeating themselves by ratracing. Maybe.

@Victor

@Portrait34 speaking of nuclear, Japan plans to release nuclear water waste from Fukushima nuclear disaster into the ocean. Approved by the UN..

They say it's completely safe because it's diluted by large amounts of water... Which is obviously bs..

A Japanese guy drank this diluted water from fukushima on live TV a couple years ago. It was to help ease the concerns of lingering radioactivity. He died soon after.

Poisoning the water is already happening..

Both Plutonium and Uranium oxidize like most other metals, so it's very likely there was a stronger concentration of oxidized metal particles in the water at the dumpsite. It's plausible to argue that the under water environment can more easily handle those particles after they've been dispersed on the ocean current and buried under sediments. However, this begs the question, did they give the poor bastard untreated waste water, did they even think to put it through simple distillation?

@destraht shutting nuclear is premature at least, yet.... and I have already agreed.

Only logical reason to shut them is: its shut now investing in alt sources will be more beneficial, less risky that next gov will.change its mind, its done.

Germany also imports nuke energy from France, last winter Germany was net exporter of energy to France, Germany had approved several LNG terminals to be built, whole EU has huge plans to build plenty of wind and solar farms (recent problems with Simens turbines might be minor hiccup).

Now lets imagine Germany being invaded by Wysehrad group. They gets agreement with RU to shut the gas, by infiltration they manage to disable 50% of nuke power plants (no wind or solar avail), they are fucked. Germans and EU might understand that energy is so fucking basic.that it is better to have million windfarms that have the lifespan longer than average war, but logistically you cant just walk in and shut the power grid with finger's snap.

Utilities in a home include electricity, gas, water, sewer, Internet, telephone, cable TV, security systems and, in some areas, trash collection.

Those essential ones, easy to fuck with are: electricity and water. Total warfare would include poisoning water.

Again not a single chart in this video. More like scaremongering based on tv available facts, not that tv these days is exactly for that, manipulating masses.