@Typo-MAGAshiv Not only that, believing Trump was mixed up in this requires one to believe that the victims and their lawyers were lying. Now why on earth would the victims and their lawyers say Trump wasn't one of the abusers if in fact he was? The claim is preposterous when that is taken into account.
What is interesting about the Epstein files released is Epstein's contempt for white gentiles. The files are full of disparaging remarks. Hence he had no problem fleecing them and screwing their underage girls. That won't get widely reported.
@Stigma Rothschild group was subject to a tax investigation in 2015. Epstein had very high up government connections. Someone like him is useful when facing tax issues. Not sure what you think this document represents. It's like hiring Eric Holder for a legal matter when having someone on the legal team with certain political connections would be useful.
He was already rich in 2015
Right? You think you get a contract with the Rothschilds in 2015 for $25m as your first ever go at it? Why do I need to point out the inference that this is their middle history? Where Epstein comes from and his motivations are also published.
The other, to my mind, clear inference is who the money is circulating around - I can't sit here and spoon feed every single implication, at some point you're going to have to find the narrative thread yourself.
@Typo-MAGAshiv I don't know why that is so hard for people to understand. If there were anything on Trump, it would have been used years ago. Further, while people tend to lump the rich and powerful all together, Trump is an outsider in those circles; they've never accepted him in the establishment, and Epstein was very much establishment. Plus, Trump didn't need Epstein to get beautiful women, unlike dorks such as Gayes and Reid Hoffman.
@Stigma He was already rich in 2015. It appears he was some kind of spy or arms dealer. Otherwise, Robert Mueller wouldn't have been involved when Epstein first got in trouble with the authorities in FL. But in any event, info like that won't be in the files of some schlub at the FBI, or any files for that matter.
Rothschild should consider hiring attorneys that don't misspell its name in contracts (fourth line). That aside, ostensibly this agreement is for consulting services in connection with a tax investigation the group was facing at the time. Hardly some smoking gun, as Epstein was putatively some kind of financial advisor.
That won't be in any files, and we'll never get that information.
It is in the files. We know it's old money. We know it's the same old names and faces. If we can stop partisan stonewalling, and especially making reductive statements like "teens prostituting themselves" when the reality is they were raping children, and referring to them as different kinds of pizzas to be served up - we might get some way to talking about reality.
@SeasonedRP Man, look, I don't care. He's argued the files aren't real. He's argued they're all a hoax. He's argued they've all been released and he's met his pledge. He's argued they exonerate him, which is a miracle for things that aren't real.
Which lie, specifically, should I believe? I'm choosing none of the above, and there isn't a single thing or person on the face of this earth that can disavow me of the idea that every single apparatus of the west isn't involved and corrupted by some really dark and malign scary shit.
This is why I don't care though, because we can't even get around to discussing what's important about them because the partisan circus rolls into town to defend their team.
Again, it's all fake and gay.
