that's certainly what you're doing to avoid the context of the mentions of Trump in order to maintain your decision of "Orange Man bad".
No. Let's be very specific here.
I'm hammering the partisan bullshit because it is obstructive to the truth being laid out for all to see in the entirety of the files.
I don't give a shit who is named, so long as we get to see how and why they are named in the entirety of the files.
We do not have full context. Full context is being obstructed. I will continue to point at who is obstructing that full release, be it Biden, Trump or whoever comes next.
Pulling a bullshit weapons grade copium narrative about 5D chess on releasing the files is embarrassing fiction justifying the obstruction of the truth.
You want to @ someone about partisan shit slinging go do it to someone else. My involvement begins and ends at truth seeking.
Read MoreMy facetious crossing out of his myriad excuses points at a man not entirely comfortable with the files. Why? Everyone should want to know the answer to that - and any indication otherwise or declaration of innocence is partisan and suspect as hell.
I'll admit that I was starting to get pissed off at the time, but did you notice that after campaigning on releasing them, he waited until his political opponents were screaming and demanding they be released before he released them? It's because if he tried to do it in a straightforward manner, everyone connected to the Clintons, Bill Gates, etc would have tried to stymie and block the release. Instead, he baited them into being in favor of it.
He played his opponents like a fiddle, and now they look like retards when they shriek about "but he's mentioooooned!" without accounting for the context.
Read More@Stigma I'll have to save this and other video recommendations for the weekend
A gmail format, searchable, collating the epstein files.
@Bozza @MENTorpheus @typo-magashiv
www.youtube.com/watch?v=YDfDWDTIg0E
Worth watching, in my opinion
@SwarmShawarma One VPN to rule them all, and in the network, doxx them
Being referenced or mentioned in the files isn't indication of a crime. Nor are FBI call ins withot backing evidence.
I mostly agree, if this were in a vacuum. My facetious crossing out of his myriad excuses points at a man not entirely comfortable with the files. Why? Everyone should want to know the answer to that - and any indication otherwise or declaration of innocence is partisan and suspect as hell.
This puzzle won't be solved without all of the pieces. You get in the way of those pieces, you're a suspect. That's where I'm at.
@MentORPHEUS Come on already man get with the program... which is uh... they aren't real they're a dem hoax they exonerate him they're all released Umm.. shit, which one are we going with again?

