www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/2009a_bpea_hamilton-1.pdf
link between oil shocks and economic recession research
Key Study (2019, McGill University) Researchers steeped a single plastic ("silken") teabag (made of nylon and PET) at 95°C (brewing temperature) and found it released:
~11.6 billion microplastics
~3.1 billion nanoplastics
per cup. These particles matched the bag's material composition (confirmed via FTIR and XPS spectroscopy). The levels were orders of magnitude higher than microplastics reported in other foods/drinks at the time.
Subsequent studies have found similar (or varying) high releases:
Polypropylene bags: Up to ~1.2 billion particles per milliliter (hundreds of billions per cup, depending on volume).
Nylon-6: ~8 million per milliliter.
Some cellulose/paper bags: Still ~135 million per milliliter (due to coatings, heat-sealing plastics, or fibers).
Even "bioplastic" (e.g., PLA) or composite bags can release significant amounts when steeped in hot water. Heat, agitation, and brewing time increase release.
Not All Teabags
Traditional paper teabags often contain small amounts of plastic (polypropylene) for heat-sealing edges or gluing strings/tags. These can still shed particles, though typically fewer than fully plastic "pyramid" or silken sachets.
Truly plastic-free options exist: Some brands use 100% plant fibers (e.g., abaca, wood pulp, cotton) with stitching or folding instead of heat-sealing/glue. These release far fewer (or negligible) microplastics from the bag itself. Loose-leaf tea with a metal/plastic-free infuser avoids the issue entirely.
Many companies (e.g., some UK brands like PG Tips or Yorkshire) have phased out plastics, but transparency varies. Always check for explicit "plastic-free" or "compostable without plastic" claims, and verify via the brand's site.
Health Context Microplastics and nanoplastics are now ubiquitous (in water, food, air, and human tissues), and tea can be a notable source for regular drinkers. Particles this small can potentially be absorbed by intestinal cells. However, the long-term human health risks of this specific exposure level are still under study—acute toxicity was observed in water fleas, but human data is limited.
Read More@SwarmShawarma there were things in common (like Shrek), but there were differences. I tried some differences with each one.
I also never used a mulligan. Even when it tanks for a bit, it always comes back.
@Typo-MAGAshiv you had all seed more or less the same?
@Typo-MAGAshiv fauck it I'm going for a swim, fuck my slave and check a drink water supply
Picture this: a nature documentary uncovering the wild world of Shrek lovers. Banging moms, supporting ICE, and wine AI abound while claiming Shrek gives life meaning. Genius!
@SwarmShawarma and I'm a fucking aircraft carrier and its accompanying fleet, laughing at your adrift primitive broke ass
@Typo-MAGAshiv I am a Viking on a boat in the middle of an ocean, ready to strike a gold, but no fucking wind here
#Women are threat to themselves, way over 5x more than men are
"Male-on-male homicide (vast majority of male homicides): UK ~1.3 per 100,000 males; US ~5–8 per 100,000 males (overall male homicide much higher than female); Australia/Canada/Netherlands ~0.8–2 per 100,000 males. Male victims dominate all non-intimate-partner homicides.
®®®®®®®®®®®®®®
Male suicides: UK ~13 per 100,000 males; US ~25+; Australia ~20; Netherlands/Canada ~15–20. (Typically 3–4× female suicide rates.)
®®®®®®®®®®®
Female suicides: UK ~5 per 100,000; US ~6–7; Australia ~6–7; Netherlands/Canada ~5–8."
©©©©©©©©©©
The best available US data on intimate partner homicides (IPH) broken down by relationship type (heterosexual vs. lesbian vs. gay male couples) and normalized per 100,000 couples comes from a 2008 study by Mize and Shackelford.
Rates were calculated per million couples per year (“per annum”) using U.S. Census 2003 estimates of married + unmarried opposite-sex and same-sex partner households (assuming roughly stable annual relationship prevalence over the period). No newer study provides equivalent per-couple IPH rates by sexual orientation; recent CDC/BJS reports focus on overall IPH (mostly female victims) or lifetime IPV prevalence, without this exact breakdown or denominator.
Converted to the requested format (homicides per 100,000 couples per year):
-Gay male couples: 6.372 homicides per 100,000 couples per year → 1 in ~15,700 gay male couples experiences an IPH per year. -Lesbian couples: 0.907 homicides per 100,000 couples per year → 1 in ~110,250 lesbian couples experiences an IPH per year. -Heterosexual couples (overall): 2.125 homicides per 100,000 couples per year → 1 in ~47,060 heterosexual couples experiences an IPH per year.
Heterosexual breakdown by perpetrator gender (per 100,000 heterosexual couples per year):
-Male perpetrator/female victim: 1.328 homicides per 100,000 couples per year → 1 in ~75,300. -Female perpetrator/male victim: 0.797 homicides per 100,000 couples per year → 1 in ~125,470.
2:1 ratio
Read More
