Go on a torrent download video pack of Tim Torrero. His vids are the best to show you how good he got. That includes an anonymous videos from pull to actually fucking audio in rooms (that likely got him in some troubles later)..
There is more men, with say 100 notches, that got 'burned' and you can read about them. But TT you can watch for hours on videos, very real.
And what happened later? He committed suicide. Depression , being low, for whatever reason is not unique to you, it will come and go. Number of women you'll fuck not necessarily will help with that. TT seems to be a very good lad too.
Brace yourself.
Learn from exp.
Cut all links with woman, otherwise you cant take step back and see big pic.
@JamesSkepp street, it is played on CCTV channel, hard to get any sort of subscription
custody should always go to the less disturbed parent. That is, to the man, unless he is really problematic.
Sure, I agree, but the family courts can't decide who is the 'less disturbed' parent. It's too vague,
and if there is any room for wiggle, the courts are so beta and cucked that they will give custody to the woman. That is what it means to live in a Femocracy.
So we need a much clearer, harder to fudge decider: who earns more money?
Both rules will be overriden by a femocracy/hypergamy optimzation.
The only way to be fairer (meritocratic) is not to have a femocracy.
Haha, now I think I have used all tools to say it.
(Deleted for typos)
The judge does not want to hear about he said / she said and
Yes I went trough the system once in the same country as you (I assume uk).
Preparing for a sitting, I have read about not getting into a nonsense squabbled, kept my wits, didnt do a stupid shit.
In effect I was still surprised that I have gotten very well and got more then ex.
Today we dont need to rely only in she/he said. Although not ideal, video recordings, that make a pattern of spousal behaviour should be easily admissible.
But that is a separate point to the 'foundation's post Earlier.
@Lone_Ranger hey Ranger, I have not supported any of the sides of a 'sanity vs money' argument. MAYBE thats why you cant understand me.
I have just noticed that foundation of the argument should not come from a femocracy point of view, just for one side.
femocracy will get out of the window BOTH solutions (or anything that stands in a way of hypergamy), anyway.
we COULD even assume they both do not exist today for the very same reason.
#uk In coffid times long time ago I have set up an instant messanger for people in UK to find wingmen.
It is not particullary popular platform but lets the participants to remain fairly anonymous (use your own judgment).
To look it up, one need to install Element app, or join from Element io website.
In search engine in app one should find many 'rooms' upon searching for 'wingmen' phrase.
Rooms divide whole uk into several parts for better wing location.
@Lone_Ranger this thread skipped an original reply, but here we go.
I got your point 100% but to be humble say 99% :)
You have dismissed adaml? reply that a fair judgment, on who is more sane wont happen because it is femocracy, so law is skewed as it is.
Then you propose a rigid factor that would in seconds establish who gets all the 'toys'. You totally skipped the point that the system is already skewed (as per your assumption its already a femocracy) so that would mean that anything that is not good for women gets overturned even if you somehow managed to pushint into an existing law.
We arrive at the point, where femocracy doesn't exist and we can decide which is a better rule: the money or a sanity.
I did some reading about Cyprus. Look at the stats highlighted.
This is what the US citizens would likely do if they could fly to Colombia for $50 both ways.
Guy from the an article has got a paper written following this article, but I couldnt find one with a free access.
Above article is called:
It’s all about the conversation: why Cypriot men prefer foreign blondes
If you wanna see it in full.
Maybe the DNS isse comes from 8888
The new devil's number
Im sure it divides by 666 or smth
@Vermillion-Rx it is a ass long thread so I have only replied to most recent entires. That being how would they adjust to not marrying BB with 'sole' purpose to divorce him later without any problems and cash and prizes.
2 points in my prwvuius post would be an adjustements women would employ to subvert a simple removal of a no fault divorce.
To make it work a man would have to be tra'eated fairly when filing for a divorce when a woman misbahaves and does so in not so obvious way (a psy warefare - milestatiin is not recognised as a weapon women use, not widely anyway)
