Has anyone read Sex and Character - Otto Weininger (1903)?

ChatGPT has changed its policy, now it can tell "women jokes", in which, however, women are ridiculous because of problems that men create.

@adam-l hey @Ill_Will7, why didn't you post that to the Red Pill forum?

Fuck reddit.

@Ill_Will7 I hate divulging any personal info online...

Women tend to fight between them, on the long run. So a main one and changing the side piece is what men used to do back in the day. As long as the main one is secure/submitted enough to go along...

@Lionsmane8 I've come to the conclusion that two is the number.

@adam-l polygamy is the panacea

old.reddit.com/r/TheRedPill/comments/1h2e7sd/committing_to_a_woman_will_never_take_you_to_your/

Might as well give away this pro tip:

Browse /r/BPD

It's chock-full of examples of typical female behaviour. If autism is the far end of the male brain, borderline (i.e. not-quite-madness) is the far end of the female one.

@woodsmoke

Countries or nations function at a different level than individuals, and often have interests that don't align with those of their subjects.

Back in the Roman era, for example, males were penalized if they didn't marry, because they had to produce children.

Marriage as an institution was tailored for the interests of the state, not the people, and definitely not the man. Sure, monogamy afforded some females to the lower classes, but a wife for life was so miserable that prostitution or refuge to a mistress was rampant.

@adam-l

The whole point of monogamy is to get as many men as possible invested in the prosperity of their family and, thus, wider society.

Any system which deviates from that design necessarily leaves some men out in the cold, thus weakening that society unnecessarily.

I'm not saying husband, wife and mistress never happened but it was never the norm in monogamous cultures. It couldn't be. That would defeat the entire purpose.