Greetings fellow agents-provocateur and CIA forum-managers, just catching up here!
In relation to UAP, I'd like to point out:
Why is this happening? It feels mildly blue-beam-ish, but at the same time, it seems weirdly low-effort. I don't actually think airbases are flying around cheap drones in order to convince the public that there's a real alien threat. At most, it feels like muddying the waters in some way.
Read More@Vermillion-Rx I agree the fentanyl is significant and could be/probably is entirely responsibly for the heart attack
Derek Chauvin doesn't deserve this
Pretty minor compared to war, but imagine being a police officer, arresting a criminal who dies as a result of the arrest, then ending up in prison and being stabbed repeatedly. The world has betrayed him. I just watched the video and it doesn't look like a murder to me. It looks like police doing their best to control someone acting erratically, who seems to keep repeating that he "can't breathe" even when there's nothing constraining his chest or neck.
@destraht Glad to see some people are making property-ownership progress
@firmware_pimp if you find what you seek, do share!
Anybody got working links to pizzagate threads/videos? I've watched some stuff on Podesta previously but it's hard to dig up again using search
Yeah, there are some details to it, and I agree that breeding with a severely inbred mate probably doesn't make sense from a fitness perspective. But still, there is the general tendency that some non-zero distance-from-self is better than continued breeding from within a restricted gene-pool which is basically guaranteed to lead to inbreeding. No, I don't see my relatives exhibiting signs of inbreeding, but I don't plan on testing the waters with the next generation either.
If you reverse the question, why would you want to encourage in-group mating? I don't see the genetic argument for this. I can see certain socio-cultural arguments, but not genetic arguments.
Why are you confusing in-group mating for inbreeding or close-relative pairing?
@carnold03 Yeah, there are some details to it, and I agree that breeding with a severely inbred mate probably doesn't make sense from a fitness perspective. But still, there is the general tendency that some non-zero distance-from-self is better than continued breeding from within a restricted gene-pool which is basically guaranteed to lead to inbreeding. No, I don't see my relatives exhibiting signs of inbreeding, but I don't plan on testing the waters with the next generation either.
If you reverse the question, why would you want to encourage in-group mating? I don't see the genetic argument for this. I can see certain socio-cultural arguments, but not genetic arguments.
