@jwayne Because students are trained away from critical thinking, people generally always work in half truths. A part that’s obviously true to grab on to, and a part deferred in exchange for protection. It’s why it’s so easy to take an idea (women deserve rights), agree with it, and tack on a bunch of questionable subsequent assumptions (there must be no unsupervised male only spaces).
Is there any good reason to use 'gender?' As far as I can tell it's a strong linguistic hook that works well because it's never defined so never rejected. It's an example of one of many feet in the door for acceptance of non-descriptive anti-useful PC talk as well as other language tricks like redefining words such as racism and sexism to exclude those most likely to cooperate at scale (whites, men) from every public platform.
It's like bitches who ask to be called women, not girls. Technically they're women, but it slides a wedge of formality into all interactions. Formality precludes criticism because generally people only speak formally to superiors.
With guys, you would say ridiculous and insensitive things to stretch your lateral thinking when problem solving, whereas quota filling coloreds and women (let's assume they are equally capable) are conditioned via a system that delivers special treatment as incentive to become social enforcers of the status quo.
They've learned to interpret and engage with scenarios as power struggles, and are wary of cooperating on a task with people who don't use the same vocabulary as them because they can't help but subconsciously register their own special treatment and must then rationalize that any system that empowers victims must be just, and they wouldn't be receiving such special treatment if they weren't still a victim.
They are so thoroughly deceived about other people's psychology that they will for example interpret frustration and even desperation as aggression, because doing so may further benefit their circumstances and validate their deluded perceptions.
Gender. Not even once.
Read MoreCan anyone tell me how to have spy-free phone convos? Facebook at least can hear my phone calls. I don't understand security at all. Like, even on trp, why do people feel safe talking about the voldemorts when everything is surely monitored? It seems hard to believe that any mainstream communication service isnt using AI to monitor keywords in type and speech. Is a vpn essential? Would I need to start all new accounts for that to be effective?
@hoit I do think that ADE is one of the most important factors to consider due to the "airborne AIDS", "it hides in your intestines or tissues" explanations for how it seems to stick around and come back with a vengeance.
The problem with ADE is that its exceedingly difficult to prove without a doubt. It took fifteen years of tracking many children into adulthood in Nicaragua to prove that the ADE exploit exists in Dengue. Its rather convoluted to explain in a fear mongering sound byte. Anyone standing up on the podium definitely declaring ADE would be shredded by the normie-norm scientific community. I think that it comes down to fear as well as being the antithesis arch-foe of the vaccine sphincter tattoo-chip industry.
We have a huge hint though in that the SARS coronavirus very much appears to have the ADE exploit. SARS has been around much longer for studying and pondering.
Read More@destraht I haven't seen much about ADE. Do you stil think that's a factor to consider?
@redpillschool working fine. I have to scroll to the end of a comment chain to click out. Any solution for that?
@hoit I've been anticipating and predicting some sort of health passport out of all of this. Just more shit to deal with.
