I have written about AWALThttps://www.trp.red/p/deeplydisturbed/1782previously, but it recently occurred to me that my explanations could us some clarification. So to that end, here are some thoughts:

Overview

Many, if not all of us, can agree that AWALT is not technically true; it is merely an assumption. At least a few of us can point to at least a few good woman who resisted the worst aspects of womanhood. We also know that women can be one way with one man, and another way with another man. So NAWALT – at least not all the time, in all cases. It has some nuance to it- context and a bunch of other things matter.

Yet despite this, we must proceed as AWALT is true. There are a few very important reasons for this.

1. All women are capable of doing bad things just like all men. I imagine a standard normal distribution curve with outliers on either tail. On one end you have pious women who would never harm a fly and would rather die that betray her own honor. On the other end you have serial predators and baby killers; and, since most women are in the middle of that curve, AWALT.
2. Among Western women, disrespecting and fucking over men is seen as a cultural and moral good. Women who are pro-male are ostracized. Imagine being anti-feminist as a young female college student. You will be mocked, disrespected, and ostracized. Because even the most open minded, kind, sweet, innocent little girl can be corrupted in this way so easily by framing her goodness as a weakness, and a pathetic acquiescence to patriarchy, AWALT
3. If we ignore the AWALT principle - even briefly - the consequences to ourselves (as men) and our children can be catastrophic. (My own story has been backed up by a few other stories here of exactly what happens to a man who fails to accept this). So it behooves us to trust NO woman. Even when she proves herself over a very long period of time, she can become a different person as quickly as she can hit a light switch. Not even our mothers and sisters can be trusted; because, well, AWALT.

So to those men who have heard me discuss this in the past, I stand by my original premise: Always assume AWALT.

The Logic Behind AWALT

For me, the logic flows in a circular pattern something like this:

• NAWALT, but all women are capable of evil, so I must assume AWALT.
• NAWALT, but if I am wrong the consequences can be devastating, so I must assume AWALT.
• NAWALT, but it is so easy to corrupt the minds of young women, that I must assume AWALT.
• NAWALT, but because women tend to side with other women even before their own kin, I must assume AWALT.
• NAWALT, but because our culture (including law enforcement, the Courts, and the entire entertainment industry, to name several) have been so egregiously dangerous to the common man, I must assume AWALT (including their male "allies").
• NAWALT, but because good women must pay a steep price to resist feminist ideals (most notably social isolation from other women) one cannot expect the average woman to resist forever. So I must assume that in the long run, AWALT.
• NAWALT, but cultural forces are VERY powerful Even my foreign born, traditional, average looking, family oriented cuteypie will undergo a lifetime of pressures at almost every level. Any woman who spends enough time in American culture, will ultimately adapt to the culture. Regardless of how much they make fun of "gringas", "shiksas", "liberals" or even feminists, they will ultimately become infected with one or more bad attitudes about men. Sooner or later they will become at least partially an Americanized; and most American women have a few things in common, most notably feminist attitudes to one degree or another. So I must assume AWALT.
• NAWALT, but because (in addition to all of the above) women also undergo drastic hormonal and other changes in their mid 40’s (on average). Two things are undefeated: the Wall and biology. All women change fundamentally and permanently upon hitting reaching menopause. It is simply nature, so it is not her fault, and there is nothing she can do to stop this. And because those changes are rarely in a direction that improves relationship, I must accept that she will change for the worst. And I must assume that sooner or later she will become just like all the women around her - i.e. AWALT.

I think you get the idea, no matter how I have tried to “break” AWALT, I always arrive at the same conclusion.

Final Note:

To many women, male feminists, and assorted other allies, AWALT can sound like an insult or a put down. But on the contrary, it is a simple acknowledgement of the power of feminism. Because let’s face it men – feminism has effectively won the “gender war”. They lost a few battles, and there are still a few skirmishes, but that ideology owns us now.

And just like any other conquered people, each of us must find a way to work within this new system. After WWII, the Japanese were given an entirely new governmental structure, schools, post office and even labor laws. And over time they went back to being Japan (with a twist?). But for a while, they had to accept being ruled over by a conquering force under the direct control of a military General officer.

When the British took over India, they reacted as Ghandi told them to react: Just sit down and do nothing. Imagine a billion people taking beatings but refusing to stand and work. Passive resistance won in the long run.

Ask any of the 100 million dead Ukrainians and Russians if they could go back and do one thing over, I would bet that at least a few million would say “I should not have trusted my neighbor.” Because in times like these, you must assume your neighbors are Party spies seeking to gain favor, or avoid being subject to scrutiny. In the long run, centralize planning fell apart and the Oligarchs took control. And things are fairly calm now.

The same thing can be said of Weimar Germany, in which neighbors called the police on their very own friends and neighbors. Germany lost the war, as did the rest of the West, and to this day the common German citizen is not much more than a peasant, forced to pay for the sins of elites from long ago. Who knows if they will ever be truly free again.

And because so many people can so easily be coerced into harming the good people around them, and and because the consequences to getting this wrong can be so catastrophic, trust will be in short supply in such societies under such conditions. It is simply how humans can get under certain types of duress. Add sex/gender differences to the mix and it compounds things by an order of magnitude.

So for the foreseeable future it would behoove us all to assume in all cases at all times that AWALT, because your very life and well-being may depend on it.

Tip deeplydisturbed for their post.