From her website, this is recent @Typo-MAGAshiv That said, firstly, her statement of no height requirement is rather extraordinary. Either she's sincere OR she's smart enough to know that putting a height requirement will subject her to mutual judgement of appearance. Then again, her explicit statement of no height requirement implies that she's enforcing one quietly (otherwise, why say so? hmmm?)

Next, her bachelor degree requirement screams hypergamy. In Sili Valley, plenty of successful men don't have them. Bill Gates and Steve Jobs were college dropouts. She's severely limiting her pool with that alone. Perhaps she's also using it as a filter in that she doesn't want (ick!) PLUMBERS to send in an "application" even as she's a Vintage Clothing store owner.

In her defense, @mattyanon I dated corporate nuns and they didn't ride the CC but rather were just lazy waiting for men to ask them out even thinking this is virtuous because "men like being the pursuer". She appears to have had multiple relationships where the guy didn't commit including amazingly the fiance who died. Think about it: he didn't put a ring on her EVEN AS HE WAS DYING. She's the classical definition of leftover: She was too proud to make an effort to pursue men and her biological clock ran out.

Our society, including many in the RP community, shames incels who don't improve themselves or live in their mother's basements, blah blah blah but this is no worse than such women who sit around with entitlement attitudes for a man with options to approach her and pass her shit tests AND take the steps for commitment.

Looking at her full website, if we didn't pull her apart she'd look otherwise ok (Rule 3) BUT when we consider the above, what happened becomes clear. She got 3800 applications. Here's the thing: Even though it appears she blew 42 years of her life, I'm impressed with what she did here. This is a legitimate effort she made to market herself and maximize what is left of her potential. She's reasonably pretty and with IVF (hey @ogrilla99 ) she has a chance.

I'm reminded of this woman who did something similar: A meh woman who put in an effort and landed a pretty good catch: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d6wG_sAdP0U

I think if more women did this, it would signal to other women to "move out of the basement", so to speak. I wish her well.

We should follow up in about 6 months to see if she actually does land anyone.

Chaperone? Women are nothing if not creative when coming up with new ways to insult men...

The real question is, why would men bother going out alone? You can drink the same beer at home that you can find at a bar, for probably 1/10th the cost. It's not like there's a chance someone is going to buy you drinks there. Even a coffee shop is pretty dumb these days. The coffee is at least $5/cup for something you can brew yourself for 5 cents. Unless you're meeting someone or hanging out with friends, there's no reason to waste that type of money.

In the past, men had to spend that money, pay the cover charges, etc. just for a chance to meet (and likely be rejected by) women. It's not like men enjoyed paying twenty bucks to stand inside a bar with an overpriced drink in your hand, trying to find a woman to chat up who won't reject you in humiliating fashion. We just had no other choice.

Now we do. Just like women can scroll through 50 matches on tinder while taking a dump, men can stay at home and check their matches, and only go out when they already have a date arranged. And even then, be able to set the terms of the date (like coffee only) before you walk in. And if you have no matches, at least you didn't waste your money or your time at some coffee shop hoping to strike up a conversation.

Women are the ones who make such a big deal about the "constant dangers" lurking behind every restaurant and bar, and what an enormous act of courage and sacrifice it is for them to meet at a public place with a stranger. Or how they brave the risk of permanent trauma from a man who attempts to say hi to her in the grocery store. Why all of a sudden are they saying they miss it?

Stepping back, I think this speaks to yet another way in which feminism is completely blind to the struggles of men. Just like they all wanted to have jobs because "it's so empowering!" (to be a wage slave), completely blind to the drudgery of it because men don't complain. Then they get what they ask for, find out it ain't all it's cracked up to be, then wail about how men need to fix it for them.

In this case, feminists go on and on about the "burden of performance", as if putting on some makeup and not behaving like an entitled shrew is such a burden. Meanwhile, men have a much higher burden of performance: spend money they don't have to show that they're rich, be the one to initiate conversations and carry them through, entertaining the girl like a dancing monkey, all the while taking the risk of humiliating rejection. And now that the risks have increased (being blasted on facebook, risking your job, etc), men are refusing to take on this burden, and women are left wondering why men "no longer make the effort". Bitch, did you think we enjoyed that effort?

It was barely worth it before. Now that the rewards have decreased (the quality of women), while the risks have increased, and there are alternatives in the form of online dating, why is it a surprise we're no longer out in public actively trying to meet women?