RULES
The Hub is moderated for decorum. Please follow these rules while participating in The Hub:
- Be courteous and friendly to new members.
- Do not attempt to scare off new users from using the platform.
- Do advertise your Tribes and invite users to join conversations in them.
- Always Follow Our Content Policy
These rules only apply to The Hub with the exception of the content policy which is site-wide. Please observe individual tribe rules when visiting other tribes.
Sick of Rules? Want to Shit-talk?
Join The Beer Hall
Want a FLAIR next to your name? Send a message to redpillschool. Reasonable requests will be granted.
Have questions? Ask away here!
Join our chatroom for live entertainment.
Back in the day I thought we should have a Mrs Archwinger appreciation day.
As the alchemists showed, unsolvable problems contributed majorly to the advance of human knowledge.
I like how @Kloi sums up the current state of affairs.
What's left out, though, is men's need for love. (Men need love but can't find it, because women are incapable of it, while women find love but can't feel content because they are gluttonous by nature).
Until 100 years ago, a man was supposed to enter marriage with a woman after he made her submitt. The taming of the shrew was a prerequisite.
Now, capitalism has found that it can squeeze more surplus out of the family if it constantly excites the shrew. There's no reprieve for the man. (Typo, you've read Esther Vilar's second book, The polygamous sex, right? It's a bit dated, no evopsych back then, but it's impressive how she is able to grasp the gist of the difference in male/female love using 70s sociological notions and a humanitarian perspective).
The sad fact is that a relationship that is not supposed to last "till death do us part" necessarily turns into an antagonism of who can extract the most out of it. And women, having a more integrated psychopathic mode, are more equipped for that.
Read MorePublic service message: If you enjoy the content, please consider posting this link to the Reddit version of WAATGM since I cannot. It drives more traffic to this site, such as myself, and that's how the content creation happens. Please do your part: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RlC5DEp2EOQ
@Typo-MAGAshiv Flairing as WAATGM In the Making because she appears (developing) cognizance of her future. Please reflair appropriately if required.
The way I read this is that the woman who wrote this does not fully understand hypergamy. Hypergamy in practice is women seeking the best possible man she can for relationships and marriage, and while traits such as physical attractiveness are part of the equation, it is most certainly not the only part of the equation. One of the core tenants of "gaming women" is about how you present your personality.
And when this woman says "Actually, personality is a far bigger factor than just looks," she is not presenting new information. What she has done is narrowed the definition of hypergamy to looks and money, "debunks" it by stating that there are other traits that play a role besides too. Traits that are well established to be part of hypergamy. Of course women want a guy who also has the personality as part of the package. Men have been talking about how to improve themselves in the social sphere to succeed with women better for decades. So this is not groundbreaking news.
I will say that for a man to be the most successful with getting attention from women, he will find it easier if he has more of everything. More earnings, better physical attractiveness, more charisma/personality, and anything else that women seek.
One major factor with why looks are so emphasized is dating apps. Many men have a hard time getting to step 1 of dating if they cannot even get a date. It is hard to argue that personality is more important when you cannot even get to the phase where that starts mattering. Another thing, "personality" is often subjective to looks as well. I am not saying personality does not matter, but we are doing the equivalent of telling job seekers that they need to improve their interview skills to have a better chance of being hired when they are telling you that their resume keeps getting autorejected by the broken job portals. So we first need to get past the issue of the autorejection before we claim that "what really matters is your interview skills." Both the resume and the interview skills are relevant to hirability, as both looks and personality are relevant to success in dating. We simply need to understand what the first hurdles are when discussing issues.
Read MoreIt starts at 32 with a Rice Crispy cake. By 42, she's a 300-lb walking land whale shoving an Entire cake into her mouth.
Hypergamy wouldn't exist if all men were in the top 10%. DUH.
@SwarmShawarma and I'm a fucking aircraft carrier and its accompanying fleet, laughing at your adrift primitive broke ass
It is not volume of speech, but precision of character, that commands respect.

